From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18741 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2010 18:56:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 18733 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2010 18:56:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:56:27 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogj8T-0002Xq-Mc for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:56:17 +0200 Received: from s209p8.home.99maxprogres.cz ([85.93.118.17]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:56:17 +0200 Received: from bonzini by s209p8.home.99maxprogres.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:56:17 +0200 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: GFDL/GPL issues Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4C59B7C5.4000203@gnu.org> References: <4C5195FA.2060208@codesourcery.com> <4C52B176.7040807@adacore.com> <4C52E1C0.6090400@codesourcery.com> <4C53696B.7030801@adacore.com> <4C536B50.4010402@codesourcery.com> <11008022317.AA08984@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20100803162022.GU17485@synopsys.com> <20100804002105.744fb6af@shotwell> <20100804164618.GX17485@synopsys.com> <4C59B33A.207@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM, bkoz@redhat.com, paul_koning@Dell.com, kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu, dnovillo@google.com, dewar@adacore.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, iant@google.com, mark@codesourcery.com, richard.guenther@gmail.com, stevenb.gcc@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.5 In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20100804190200.ktY5NEGz1aYI41Ml4Z-sgDEqNv0DT7EmOjXfVOto5lY@z> On 08/04/2010 08:48 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > You probably haven't read this thread fully, or you wouldn't imply > that GCC should have an "options manual" separate from the user's > manual. > > I have read the thread in full, and I do not see the problem with > keeping that info in a seperate manual; GCC has so many options for > various architectures and systems that I think it makes technical > sense to have a "Invoking GCC" manual. The limitation would also apply to target-independent options. Paolo