* Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
@ 2011-04-18 20:46 H.J. Lu
2011-04-18 21:03 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-19 12:37 ` Michael Matz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2011-04-18 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Development, Jakub Jelinek, Richard Guenther
Hi,
LTO bootstrap has been broken for more than a month:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
In the meantime, we have more LTO bootstrap regressions:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48652
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48671
Do we have a plan to fix LTO bootstrap
Thanks.
--
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
2011-04-18 20:46 Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month H.J. Lu
@ 2011-04-18 21:03 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-19 12:37 ` Michael Matz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2011-04-18 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: gcc, Jakub Jelinek, Richard Guenther
> LTO bootstrap has been broken for more than a month:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
I'm about to submit a fix for the .Ldebug_info0 failure.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
2011-04-18 20:46 Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month H.J. Lu
2011-04-18 21:03 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2011-04-19 12:37 ` Michael Matz
2011-04-19 13:21 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-20 1:15 ` Jan Hubicka
1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michael Matz @ 2011-04-19 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: GCC Development, Jakub Jelinek, Richard Guenther
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
> LTO bootstrap has been broken for more than a month:
I was LTO bootstrapping yesterday just fine. You're talking about
bootstrap-profiled.
Ciao,
Michael.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
2011-04-19 12:37 ` Michael Matz
@ 2011-04-19 13:21 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-19 13:52 ` Michael Matz
2011-04-20 1:15 ` Jan Hubicka
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2011-04-19 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Matz; +Cc: gcc, H.J. Lu, Jakub Jelinek, Richard Guenther
> I was LTO bootstrapping yesterday just fine. You're talking about
> bootstrap-profiled.
Not clear at all, a regular LTO bootstrap had failed on cc1 for days here.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
2011-04-19 13:21 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2011-04-19 13:52 ` Michael Matz
2011-04-19 13:57 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michael Matz @ 2011-04-19 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: gcc, H.J. Lu, Jakub Jelinek, Richard Guenther
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I was LTO bootstrapping yesterday just fine. You're talking about
> > bootstrap-profiled.
>
> Not clear at all, a regular LTO bootstrap had failed on cc1 for days here.
Hmpf. Strange. I've bootstrapped with all languages except Ada
yesterday, with gold as plugin-ld.
Ciao,
Michael.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
2011-04-19 13:52 ` Michael Matz
@ 2011-04-19 13:57 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-19 14:02 ` Richard Guenther
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2011-04-19 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Matz; +Cc: gcc, H.J. Lu, Jakub Jelinek, Richard Guenther
> Hmpf. Strange. I've bootstrapped with all languages except Ada
> yesterday, with gold as plugin-ld.
GNU ld (with plugins) for me, but --enable-checking=yes,rtl. Maybe H.J. had
e.g. --enable-checking=release. In any case, something is brittle ATM.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
2011-04-19 13:57 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2011-04-19 14:02 ` Richard Guenther
2011-04-19 16:03 ` H.J. Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Richard Guenther @ 2011-04-19 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: Michael Matz, gcc, H.J. Lu, Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> Hmpf. Strange. I've bootstrapped with all languages except Ada
>> yesterday, with gold as plugin-ld.
>
> GNU ld (with plugins) for me, but --enable-checking=yes,rtl. Maybe H.J. had
> e.g. --enable-checking=release. In any case, something is brittle ATM.
Not really unexpected - LTO testing coverage is pretty low unless we force
everyone to do LTO bootstraps (and then LTO bootstrap is slow because
of the redundant linking for the checksums and re-optimizing libbackend.a
all the time).
Richard.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
2011-04-19 14:02 ` Richard Guenther
@ 2011-04-19 16:03 ` H.J. Lu
2011-04-20 1:16 ` Jan Hubicka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2011-04-19 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Guenther; +Cc: Eric Botcazou, Michael Matz, gcc, Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>>> Hmpf. Strange. I've bootstrapped with all languages except Ada
>>> yesterday, with gold as plugin-ld.
>>
>> GNU ld (with plugins) for me, but --enable-checking=yes,rtl. Maybe H.J. had
>> e.g. --enable-checking=release. In any case, something is brittle ATM.
>
> Not really unexpected - LTO testing coverage is pretty low unless we force
> everyone to do LTO bootstraps (and then LTO bootstrap is slow because
> of the redundant linking for the checksums and re-optimizing libbackend.a
> all the time).
>
I have been doing LTO bootstrap and reporting failures. The current
LTO bootstrap failure us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48671
--
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
2011-04-19 12:37 ` Michael Matz
2011-04-19 13:21 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2011-04-20 1:15 ` Jan Hubicka
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan Hubicka @ 2011-04-20 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Matz; +Cc: H.J. Lu, GCC Development, Jakub Jelinek, Richard Guenther
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > LTO bootstrap has been broken for more than a month:
>
> I was LTO bootstrapping yesterday just fine. You're talking about
> bootstrap-profiled.
I just fixed at least the inliner profiledbootstrap ICE. I will try to profiledltobootstrap next.
Honza
>
>
> Ciao,
> Michael.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
2011-04-19 16:03 ` H.J. Lu
@ 2011-04-20 1:16 ` Jan Hubicka
2011-04-20 17:14 ` Toon Moene
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan Hubicka @ 2011-04-20 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: Richard Guenther, Eric Botcazou, Michael Matz, gcc, Jakub Jelinek
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Richard Guenther
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
> >>> Hmpf. Â Strange. Â I've bootstrapped with all languages except Ada
> >>> yesterday, with gold as plugin-ld.
> >>
> >> GNU ld (with plugins) for me, but --enable-checking=yes,rtl. Â Maybe H.J. had
> >> e.g. --enable-checking=release. Â In any case, something is brittle ATM.
> >
> > Not really unexpected - LTO testing coverage is pretty low unless we force
> > everyone to do LTO bootstraps (and then LTO bootstrap is slow because
> > of the redundant linking for the checksums and re-optimizing libbackend.a
> > all the time).
> >
>
> I have been doing LTO bootstrap and reporting failures. The current
> LTO bootstrap failure us
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48671
This is FDO problem, not LTO problem and should be fixed now.
Honza
>
> --
> H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month
2011-04-20 1:16 ` Jan Hubicka
@ 2011-04-20 17:14 ` Toon Moene
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Toon Moene @ 2011-04-20 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
On 04/20/2011 03:16 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Richard Guenther
>> I have been doing LTO bootstrap and reporting failures. The current
>> LTO bootstrap failure us
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48671
>
> This is FDO problem, not LTO problem and should be fixed now.
>
> Honza
Perhaps more kinds of LTO bootstraps are needed.
I can squeeze what I did here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-04/msg01900.html
between the 18 UTC and 00 UTC run of the weather model (it needs about 1
hour 45 minutes) [ between 0:20 and 2:05 UTC daily ].
It only tests C and Fortran, but those are the most tested frontends
anyway (/snark)
[ counting tests in the Summary list ]
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-20 17:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-18 20:46 Broken LTO bootstrtap for more than a month H.J. Lu
2011-04-18 21:03 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-19 12:37 ` Michael Matz
2011-04-19 13:21 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-19 13:52 ` Michael Matz
2011-04-19 13:57 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-19 14:02 ` Richard Guenther
2011-04-19 16:03 ` H.J. Lu
2011-04-20 1:16 ` Jan Hubicka
2011-04-20 17:14 ` Toon Moene
2011-04-20 1:15 ` Jan Hubicka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).