public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: dj@redhat.com (DJ Delorie)
Cc: avr@gjlay.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 21:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108052101.p75L1PHO030093@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108052046.p75Kkt1Q027756@greed.delorie.com> from "DJ Delorie" at Aug 05, 2011 04:46:55 PM

DJ Delorie wrote:

> Was this reproducible for m32c also?  I can test it if so...

The patch simply passes the destination address space through
to MODE_CODE_BASE_REG_CLASS and REGNO_MODE_CODE_OK_FOR_BASE_P,
to allow targets to make register allocation decisions based
on address space.

As long as m32c doesn't implement those, just applying the
patch wouldn't change anything.  But if that capability
*would* be helpful on your target, it would certainly be
good if you could try it out ...

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-05 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-04 13:43 Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-04 16:20 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-04 16:26   ` DJ Delorie
2011-08-04 16:33     ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-04 17:28   ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-05 10:19     ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-05 12:47       ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-05 13:24         ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-05 14:09           ` Michael Matz
2011-08-05 14:29             ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-05 20:43     ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-05 20:47       ` DJ Delorie
2011-08-05 21:01         ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2011-08-05 21:08           ` DJ Delorie
2011-08-08 11:38       ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-09 17:16         ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-10 14:04           ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-17 17:44             ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-18 14:38               ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-21 16:43                 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-22 12:39                   ` Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201108052101.p75L1PHO030093@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=avr@gjlay.de \
    --cc=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).