public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: avr@gjlay.de (Georg-Johann Lay)
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108091716.p79HG1qV028050@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E3FCA77.9020101@gjlay.de> from "Georg-Johann Lay" at Aug 08, 2011 01:37:27 PM

Georg-Johann Lay wrote:

> Thanks, it works.

OK, thanks for testing!

> 	std Y+2,r31	 ;  30	*movphi/3	[length = 7]
> 	std Y+1,r30

I'm actually not seeing those (maybe I'm using a different code
base than you were using ...)

But I still see that the frame is created.  The problem is that IRA
thinks it needs to allocate a pseudo on the stack, and creates a
stack slot for it.  But then reload goes and just reloads the
pseudo into a hard register anyway, and simply doesn't need the
stack slot ... but it was already allocated and accounted for
such that get_frame_size () no longer returns 0.

> I frequently see IRA doing a very bad job for small register classes
> like here.  Maybe it's better to take it completely away from IRA
> and write the load as
> 
> (set (reg:HI)
>      (unspec:HI (post_inc:PHI (reg:PHI Z))))
> 
> Loading from __pgm is actually an unspec, i.e. reading two times from
> the same address will yield the same result.

This really seems to be a problem in IRA somewhere, but I'd guess it
would be better to fix in there instead of working around it.  Maybe
you should open a bug an get in touch with the IRA maintainers ...

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-09 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-04 13:43 Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-04 16:20 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-04 16:26   ` DJ Delorie
2011-08-04 16:33     ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-04 17:28   ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-05 10:19     ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-05 12:47       ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-05 13:24         ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-05 14:09           ` Michael Matz
2011-08-05 14:29             ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-05 20:43     ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-05 20:47       ` DJ Delorie
2011-08-05 21:01         ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-05 21:08           ` DJ Delorie
2011-08-08 11:38       ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-09 17:16         ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2011-08-10 14:04           ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-17 17:44             ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-18 14:38               ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-21 16:43                 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-22 12:39                   ` Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201108091716.p79HG1qV028050@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=avr@gjlay.de \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).