public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>
Subject: Re: status of GCC & C++
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:50:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203282150.02932.ebotcazou@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD_=9DRyL8ABYhJAjWdr-=e65A-Xi7tN3sMwFTZFvkmgckLtGg@mail.gmail.com>

> Really?  To start *writing* in C++, sure we want at least an initial
> version of the coding guidelines.  I pointed to those, because they
> look like a reasonable start.
>
> To start *building* in C++, I do not think we need to agree on the
> coding guidelines.  We are already doing stages 2 and 3, doing stage 1
> is a straightforward next step.

If we start building in C++, then this would mean that you can start to use
C++ in the code.  And we agreed to settle on a set of coding guidelines before 
starting to use C++ in the code.

Building stage 1 with a C++ compiler has zero value if you don't use C++ in 
the code.  It probably even has a negative value, since it gratuitously makes 
it harder to build the compiler on exotic platforms.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-28 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-25 17:19 Basile Starynkevitch
2012-03-25 17:25 ` Diego Novillo
2012-03-25 17:33   ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-25 17:44     ` Diego Novillo
2012-03-25 21:37       ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-25 21:46         ` Diego Novillo
2012-03-25 22:01           ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-03-28 19:50           ` Eric Botcazou [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20120325192843.05bf843acfb715c4bc9cd4aa@starynkevitch.net>
     [not found]     ` <4F6F5E48.90404@google.com>
2012-03-25 18:31       ` Basile Starynkevitch
2012-03-25 20:11         ` Basile Starynkevitch
2012-03-25 20:21           ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-03-25 20:29           ` Marc Glisse
2012-03-26 15:59           ` Configure-time testing for GCC plugins to determine C vs C++? (Was Re: status of GCC & C++) David Malcolm
2012-03-26 17:07             ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-03-26 18:18               ` David Malcolm
2012-03-26 18:33                 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2012-03-26 20:34                   ` Romain Geissler
2012-03-27  5:53                     ` Basile Starynkevitch
2012-03-27 10:23 ` status of GCC & C++ Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201203282150.02932.ebotcazou@adacore.com \
    --to=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=basile@starynkevitch.net \
    --cc=dnovillo@google.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).