From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-173480-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1986 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2012 10:04:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 1976 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2012 10:04:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:04:11 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B29290030;	Thu,  5 Apr 2012 12:04:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id BQ5DtJy+xMak; Thu,  5 Apr 2012 12:04:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from province.act-europe.fr (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214])	by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8335290009;	Thu,  5 Apr 2012 12:04:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 525)	id 9D37516495F; Thu,  5 Apr 2012 12:04:09 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:04:00 -0000
From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@adacore.com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,	Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: -Wall by default
Message-ID: <20120405100409.GA5596@adacore.com>
References: <CAAiZkiDuX94Qf3-1EONGVnxX4nsxhdHLemg9kSZRVVaarTQ-OA@mail.gmail.com> <4F7D5EB4.2060903@redhat.com> <CAAiZkiDJ_iB46Q36FQePcfyx7D35OBpdQNKmg9kCTyWMH09SqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc25PLAuc-RL7zYqUwBsjQ6kbpVh0FSCEQcVGukYDSkEhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAiZkiC_4PqK7YV0yPTijO6t0C2RBVG0PVQDetndwL+M6pdqYQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc0Lj99FPpAYEmt76o4yS7p9J4A+x1J9Pz=7uPVMEUtJmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAiZkiAgWExkammLDS3QPpk07Z+Xsv3nC0AbktY-LMejOtHakg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAiZkiAgWExkammLDS3QPpk07Z+Xsv3nC0AbktY-LMejOtHakg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2

> The simpler requests are -Wall by default.  (there are some occasional
> -pedantic).
> 
> The ones I've heard in person -- with the requesters quite competent and
> respectable programmers -- are in less polite words what I can possibly
> convey in this discussion.  Adding more options isn't on the top of the list
> (to quote "I can't go through the 10000 options to figure out which ones
> will work for something this obvious that should be done by default.")

Could you give some examples of which warnings these people were
expecting to be "obviously enabled by default" ?

I think that would be helpful.

BTW, I don't think -pedantic should be enabled by default, or this wouldn't
be "pedantic" anymore.

Arno