From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23917 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2012 21:15:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 23900 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2012 21:15:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:14:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE78290033; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:14:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3goNZnqMXpLm; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:14:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6236A290010; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:14:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Torvald Riegel Subject: Re: Switching to C++ by default in 4.8 Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:15:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Michael Matz , Xinliang David Li , Jakub Jelinek , Richard Guenther , Bernd Schmidt , Gabriel Dos Reis , David Edelsohn , Diego Novillo References: <4F7B356E.9080003@google.com> <201204110114.16666.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <1334177773.3101.165.camel@triegel.csb> In-Reply-To: <1334177773.3101.165.camel@triegel.csb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201204112313.55151.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2 > So, you only know it's 2 tokens once you know all of tree.def? I'm > aware that this is just some arbitrary example, but I believe this > actually strengthens the concern I had. Well, if you don't know of FIELD_DECL, you won't go very far, really. -- Eric Botcazou