* [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope
@ 2013-08-19 17:43 Jan-Benedict Glaw
2013-08-20 10:57 ` Alexander Ivchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-08-19 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Ivchenko; +Cc: gcc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1680 bytes --]
Hi!
My build robot[1] catched this error[2] while cross-building for
powerpc64le-linux:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../gcc/gcc -I../../../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -I. -I. -I../../../../gcc/gcc -I../../../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace \
../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux-android.c
../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux-android.c: In function ‘bool linux_android_libc_has_function(function_class)’:
../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope
if (OPTION_BIONIC)
^
make[2]: *** [linux-android.o] Error 1
Probably introduced with r201838
(http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=201838). I
guess it's just a forgotten chunk.
MfG, JBG
[1] http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/
[2] http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/#job8903
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: http://perl.plover.com/Questions.html
the second :
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope 2013-08-19 17:43 [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-08-20 10:57 ` Alexander Ivchenko 2013-08-21 14:54 ` [buildrobot] .../gcc/gcc/config/linux.h:105:34: error: ‘linux_android_libc_has_function’ " Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-08-26 16:19 ` [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ " Jan-Benedict Glaw 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Alexander Ivchenko @ 2013-08-20 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan-Benedict Glaw, gcc Hi, thanks for cathing this. I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 56e6fd4..6bb18f8 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2013-08-20 Alexander Ivchenko <alexander.ivchenko@intel.com> + + * config/linux-android.c (linux_android_libc_has_function): Fix + checks for libc. + 2013-08-20 Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@ict.ac.cn> * tree-ssa-ccp.c (get_default_value): Remove redundant condition diff --git a/gcc/config/linux-android.c b/gcc/config/linux-android.c index 4a4b48d..e9d9e9a 100644 --- a/gcc/config/linux-android.c +++ b/gcc/config/linux-android.c @@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ linux_android_has_ifunc_p (void) bool linux_android_libc_has_function (enum function_class fn_class) { - if (OPTION_GLIBC) + if (linux_libc == LIBC_GLIBC) return true; - if (OPTION_BIONIC) + if (linux_libc == LIBC_BIONIC) if (fn_class == function_c94 || fn_class == function_c99_misc || fn_class == function_sincos) is it OK? thanks, Alexander 2013/8/19 Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>: > Hi! > > My build robot[1] catched this error[2] while cross-building for > powerpc64le-linux: > > g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../gcc/gcc -I../../../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -I. -I. -I../../../../gcc/gcc -I../../../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace \ > ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux-android.c > ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux-android.c: In function ‘bool linux_android_libc_has_function(function_class)’: > ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope > if (OPTION_BIONIC) > ^ > make[2]: *** [linux-android.o] Error 1 > > Probably introduced with r201838 > (http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=201838). I > guess it's just a forgotten chunk. > > MfG, JBG > [1] http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/ > [2] http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/#job8903 > > -- > Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481 > Signature of: http://perl.plover.com/Questions.html > the second : ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [buildrobot] .../gcc/gcc/config/linux.h:105:34: error: ‘linux_android_libc_has_function’ was not declared in this scope 2013-08-20 10:57 ` Alexander Ivchenko @ 2013-08-21 14:54 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-08-26 16:19 ` [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ " Jan-Benedict Glaw 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-08-21 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexander Ivchenko; +Cc: gcc [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2055 bytes --] On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, thanks for cathing this. > > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets > that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. Slightly different, but tic6x-uclinux (http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/?id=9018 , with build log being available at http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9018&mode=view) probably also affected: g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../gcc/gcc -I../../../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace \ ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/c6x/c6x.c -o c6x.o In file included from ./tm.h:24:0, from ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/c6x/c6x.c:25: ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux.h:105:34: error: ‘linux_android_libc_has_function’ was not declared in this scope #define TARGET_LIBC_HAS_FUNCTION linux_android_libc_has_function ^ ./target-hooks-def.h:1100:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘TARGET_LIBC_HAS_FUNCTION’ TARGET_LIBC_HAS_FUNCTION, \ ^ ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/c6x/c6x.c:6839:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘TARGET_INITIALIZER’ struct gcc_target targetm = TARGET_INITIALIZER; ^ MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481 Signature of: Ich hatte in letzter Zeit ein bißchen viel Realitycheck. the second : Langsam möchte ich mal wieder weiterträumen können. -- Maximilian Wilhelm (18. Mai 2005, #lug-owl.de) [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope 2013-08-20 10:57 ` Alexander Ivchenko 2013-08-21 14:54 ` [buildrobot] .../gcc/gcc/config/linux.h:105:34: error: ‘linux_android_libc_has_function’ " Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-08-26 16:19 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-02 21:28 ` [ping^2] " Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-06 13:31 ` [ping] " Jan-Benedict Glaw 1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-08-26 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexander Ivchenko; +Cc: gcc [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1154 bytes --] Hi! On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, thanks for cathing this. > > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets > that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. > > This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. > linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. [...] It would be nice if somebody would review this patch. The initial commit had fallout on a few targets: alpha-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9537&mode=view mn10300-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9657&mode=view sparc64-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9655&mode=view tic6x-uclinux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9647&mode=view powerpc64le-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9638&mode=view (all other PPC variants, too.) Thanks, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481 Signature of: http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html the second : [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [ping^2] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope 2013-08-26 16:19 ` [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ " Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-09-02 21:28 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-02 22:10 ` David Edelsohn 2013-09-06 13:31 ` [ping] " Jan-Benedict Glaw 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-09-02 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexander Ivchenko; +Cc: gcc [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1392 bytes --] Hi! On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk@gmail.com> wrote: > > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets > > that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. > > > > This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. > > linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. > [...] > > It would be nice if somebody would review this patch. The initial > commit had fallout on a few targets: > > alpha-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9537&mode=view > mn10300-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9657&mode=view > sparc64-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9655&mode=view > tic6x-uclinux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9647&mode=view > powerpc64le-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9638&mode=view > (all other PPC variants, too.) This is still broken. Today it's two weeks. Can we please have the patch ACKed or revert the patch? MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481 Signature of: If it doesn't work, force it. the second : If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway. [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [ping^2] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope 2013-09-02 21:28 ` [ping^2] " Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-09-02 22:10 ` David Edelsohn 2013-09-03 7:48 ` Richard Biener 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: David Edelsohn @ 2013-09-02 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan-Benedict Glaw, Jakub Jelinek, Richard Biener; +Cc: Alexander Ivchenko, gcc On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets >> > that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. >> > >> > This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. >> > linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. >> [...] >> >> It would be nice if somebody would review this patch. The initial >> commit had fallout on a few targets: >> >> alpha-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9537&mode=view >> mn10300-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9657&mode=view >> sparc64-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9655&mode=view >> tic6x-uclinux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9647&mode=view >> powerpc64le-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9638&mode=view >> (all other PPC variants, too.) > > This is still broken. Today it's two weeks. Can we please have the > patch ACKed or revert the patch? I agree. This is ridiculous. Would some global reviewer please approve the fix? Thanks, David ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [ping^2] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope 2013-09-02 22:10 ` David Edelsohn @ 2013-09-03 7:48 ` Richard Biener 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Richard Biener @ 2013-09-03 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Edelsohn; +Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw, Jakub Jelinek, Alexander Ivchenko, gcc On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote: > >> On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets > >> > that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. > >> > > >> > This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. > >> > linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. > >> [...] > >> > >> It would be nice if somebody would review this patch. The initial > >> commit had fallout on a few targets: > >> > >> alpha-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9537&mode=view > >> mn10300-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9657&mode=view > >> sparc64-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9655&mode=view > >> tic6x-uclinux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9647&mode=view > >> powerpc64le-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9638&mode=view > >> (all other PPC variants, too.) > > > > This is still broken. Today it's two weeks. Can we please have the > > patch ACKed or revert the patch? > > I agree. This is ridiculous. Would some global reviewer please approve the fix? Patch is ok. _Please_ mark patches properly and send them in a separate thread. Otherwise I just notice [buildbot] and skip the mail. A proper subject would be [PATCH] Unbreak bootstrap on XYZ Richard. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope 2013-08-26 16:19 ` [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ " Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-02 21:28 ` [ping^2] " Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-09-06 13:31 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-10 0:01 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-09-06 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexander Ivchenko; +Cc: gcc [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2307 bytes --] On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, thanks for cathing this. > > > > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets > > that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. > > > > This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. > > linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. > [...] Seems the commit at Thu Sep 5 13:01:35 2013 (CEST) fixed most of the fallout. Thanks! > mn10300-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9657&mode=view This however still seems to have issues in a current build: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=10520&mode=view g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../gcc/gcc -I../../../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -I. -I. -I../../../../gcc/gcc -I../../../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace \ ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux-android.c ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux-android.c: In function ‘bool linux_android_libc_has_function(function_class)’: ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux-android.c:38:7: error: ‘OPTION_GLIBC’ was not declared in this scope if (OPTION_GLIBC) ^ ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope if (OPTION_BIONIC) ^ make[2]: *** [linux-android.o] Error 1 MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481 Signature of: Träume nicht von Deinem Leben: Lebe Deinen Traum! the second : [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope 2013-09-06 13:31 ` [ping] " Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-09-10 0:01 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov 2013-09-10 10:07 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-10 22:10 ` Joseph S. Myers 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Maxim Kuvyrkov @ 2013-09-10 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan-Benedict Glaw, Jeff Law; +Cc: Alexander Ivchenko, gcc On 7/09/2013, at 1:31 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, thanks for cathing this. >>> >>> I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets >>> that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. >>> >>> This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. >>> linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. >> [...] > > Seems the commit at Thu Sep 5 13:01:35 2013 (CEST) fixed most of the > fallout. Thanks! > >> mn10300-linux: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=9657&mode=view > > This however still seems to have issues in a current build: > > http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=10520&mode=view Jan-Benedict, Mn10300-linux does not appear to be supporting linux. Mn10300-linux target specifier expands into mn10300-unknown-linux-gnu, where *-gnu implies using Glibc library, which doesn't have mn10300 port. Jeff, You are mn10300 maintainer, is building GCC for mn10300-unknown-linux-gnu supposed to work? Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov www.kugelworks.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope 2013-09-10 0:01 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov @ 2013-09-10 10:07 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-10 22:10 ` Joseph S. Myers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-09-10 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maxim Kuvyrkov; +Cc: Jeff Law, Alexander Ivchenko, gcc [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 820 bytes --] On Tue, 2013-09-10 12:01:34 +1200, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@kugelworks.com> wrote: > On 7/09/2013, at 1:31 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > This however still seems to have issues in a current build: > > > > http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=10520&mode=view > > Mn10300-linux does not appear to be supporting linux. Mn10300-linux > target specifier expands into mn10300-unknown-linux-gnu, where *-gnu > implies using Glibc library, which doesn't have mn10300 port. Uh, I would have expected an error message then (from configury), but you may well be right. I changed over to mn10300-elf for now. MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481 Signature of: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html the second : [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope 2013-09-10 0:01 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov 2013-09-10 10:07 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2013-09-10 22:10 ` Joseph S. Myers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2013-09-10 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maxim Kuvyrkov; +Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw, Jeff Law, Alexander Ivchenko, gcc On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Mn10300-linux does not appear to be supporting linux. Mn10300-linux > target specifier expands into mn10300-unknown-linux-gnu, where *-gnu > implies using Glibc library, which doesn't have mn10300 port. It's called am33, and the GCC port is also called am33_2.0-*-linux*. (But given the lack of any updates to the glibc patches sent by the prospective port maintainer over a year ago <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2012-06/msg00066.html>, following my review comments, I'm inclined to think it's time to remove the very bitrotten glibc port.) -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-10 22:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-08-19 17:43 [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-08-20 10:57 ` Alexander Ivchenko 2013-08-21 14:54 ` [buildrobot] .../gcc/gcc/config/linux.h:105:34: error: ‘linux_android_libc_has_function’ " Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-08-26 16:19 ` [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ " Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-02 21:28 ` [ping^2] " Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-02 22:10 ` David Edelsohn 2013-09-03 7:48 ` Richard Biener 2013-09-06 13:31 ` [ping] " Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-10 0:01 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov 2013-09-10 10:07 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-09-10 22:10 ` Joseph S. Myers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).