From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-181679-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3604 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2014 11:55:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3590 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jan 2014 11:55:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vlsi1.gnat.com
Received: from vlsi1.gnat.com (HELO vlsi1.gnat.com) (205.232.38.7) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:55:52 +0000
Received: by vlsi1.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 3004)	id F321633CA7; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:55:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:34:00 -0000
To: mfwitten@gmail.com
Subject: Re: clang and FSF's strategy
Cc: baldrick@free.fr, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <CAMOZ1Bs5Fns9ss51tMOqQORBJX0mbHi7kkf00isHGT2B4uF=+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140121201949.21DE1380522@snark.thyrsus.com>    <1390401184.29263.5.camel@Iris>    <CAMOZ1BuLknscdnti45kDJgnXw=GD0ft=ARbDoSj=POyoS710DA@mail.gmail.com>    <87vbxbezsb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <52E0F72E.7030305@free.fr>    <CAMOZ1Bs5Fns9ss51tMOqQORBJX0mbHi7kkf00isHGT2B4uF=+A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20140123115550.F321633CA7@vlsi1.gnat.com>
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2

> The *political* aspects are dictating the *technical* aspects.

Perhaps.

> So... like it or not, that makes this list exactly the right place to
> have this discussion.

No because the *people* that decide the political and technical aspects
are different and this list is for the latter, not the former.