From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9795 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2014 10:06:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9784 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2014 10:06:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:06:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sACA6WNq026026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:06:32 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-30.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.30]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sACA6SW2003560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:06:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:06:00 -0000 From: Marek Polacek To: Marat Zakirov Cc: Yury Gribov , Jakub Jelinek , GCC Mailing List , Richard Biener Subject: Re: [RFC] UBSan unsafely uses VRP Message-ID: <20141112100627.GH29791@redhat.com> References: <5462170F.5040102@samsung.com> <20141111141521.GE5026@tucnak.redhat.com> <54631D7F.80301@samsung.com> <20141112084550.GF29791@redhat.com> <546330CA.6010001@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <546330CA.6010001@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 01:04:58PM +0300, Marat Zakirov wrote: > > On 11/12/2014 11:45 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: > >Yes, but as said above, VRP is only run with >-O2 and -Os. > You meant >= -O2? Yes. Marek