From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14473 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2017 00:06:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14457 invoked by uid 89); 15 Feb 2017 00:06:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=run-time, silence, UD:aix71.h, aix61h X-HELO: mail-io0-f181.google.com Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-io0-f181.google.com) (209.85.223.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:06:08 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id j18so78652907ioe.2 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:06:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=T9rkLR/f6gp4BiQ8dVTEI4ZPuzvlt1QVUiUPXycnVYc=; b=oLRPpVE/FvnUW4y77UJkYrNkmoR+kMfnSFBcgyMh1/e7/BPsFKqmuYVCzUnAp8MhfD hG7YP8MN53eVVKBkQ2cUq4zhDwh7MfMyP1xkP5VeopjTEHvFToGIQ65mdRoy+Cu8vjIA 7xN78vM54aCeGCTNGapcHbjnPhTVbEV1GGzTmuT/lo4C2G+ky00gVVVTYT6PAluWX3l3 4FmWStYKOWiuAKLGDp1Q+09z3aM/2FWmjgEDVG2I/5TIl11//p+s5BEK87VDljlZOqgw IQdSm21z7uL7KwXd5Xlva9KspHbOYrhIuJcc5qmbHBJSr8pTkfAyNtAnKCrssBbENssP evnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n3uR+NchOpb7WKXU6syuUjNU3cgBo9f4qHxYNbXvccHJruxdOjPanmfJ5GHBEkAg== X-Received: by 10.98.71.7 with SMTP id u7mr34654171pfa.76.1487117167169; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:06:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from bubble.grove.modra.org (CPE-58-160-71-80.tyqh2.lon.bigpond.net.au. [58.160.71.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 66sm3302687pfx.29.2017.02.14.16.06.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 20D8AC323E; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:36:02 +1030 (ACDT) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:06:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: David Edelsohn Cc: Segher Boessenkool , GCC Development Subject: PowerPC -many Message-ID: <20170215000601.GY3731@bubble.grove.modra.org> References: <20170214030703.GS21840@gate.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 Since we've been talking about obsoleting cpu support, how about getting rid of -many in ASM_CPU_SPEC for gcc-8? It's a horrible hack of mine to work around gcc -mcpu option handling bugs which I think have been fixed, and to silence complaints from gas about asm() written for multiple cpus (with presumably run-time selection of which block of code gets executed depending on cpu). It used to be just a linux hack, but I see David uses it in aix61.h and aix71.h too? -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM