From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27129 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2017 17:56:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27078 invoked by uid 89); 13 Mar 2017 17:56:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1178, brand, love, our X-HELO: mail-pg0-f49.google.com Received: from mail-pg0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-pg0-f49.google.com) (74.125.83.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:56:31 +0000 Received: by mail-pg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 77so66303884pgc.1 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:56:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=kLT/JSCYE0FWXBTpg215ne+Urc1lolnc/vVQS7Fiel0=; b=izIYgxIbidgqXGsRwEcQvvlE5jXb2JP5IKohTM68rPTbJbZTrSxXp6Fj4kNj3aUCME RqhMN81ITqE6rcjhnHPN/zjz1W/hlt0i1dU37V74/leYb20ZdJ6DTCT94fkYg0Doi9X0 PiVwwDO7FX2TvbqbqyIyjb32V4HIJsBAe+vvx0mBaJv8GbEBMJMpNSXCO5O1ydORapkB X25NS3J8OBLHp/FQe7GaDTmYbJzGmPqCRlq8wVyRiSDUcZqbSR5ahMmDzdrSNl2jSd+G HkVd7FdpXnKrc73QzN0hyKy6Ja+aYV3UX313cblvATG148WM7gO82zuJ3LRjKp08Eu6o /+JA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lq0sj4fC9jEuyOoUTMP/BNcvx6zKiyPwbpNTpmHu244ailmjmYea4l9JTuinR4qg== X-Received: by 10.98.196.12 with SMTP id y12mr39137081pff.49.1489427790630; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([216.38.154.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y5sm33985716pfd.33.2017.03.13.10.56.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:56:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Palmer Dabbelt To: gerald@pfeifer.com To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Target maintainers: doc/install.texi love and care Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:56:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20170313173933.5524-1-palmer@dabbelt.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 01:59:28 PDT (-0700), gerald@pfeifer.com wrote: > On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> I looked at our stuff (RISC-V) and there's almost nothing in there. >> Is there something I should add? I looked at the aarch64 stuff in the >> "host/target specific issues start here" section and there's some notes >> about binutils-2.24. We'll require binutils-2.28 (the first version that >> we're upstream in), I can add a note in that section about RISC-V as >> well if you think it's appropriate. > > I am generally a fan of keeping documentation short (lest it is > skipped or skimmed), but as long as necessary. > > In your case I don't think artificially blowing up the section on RISC-V > to match others would be helpful. However, given that binutils 2.28 is > so brand new, that I'd definitely mention. > > (My proposals/patches yesterday are about removing references to ten > year old versions of binutils from install.texi, quite the other end > of the spectrum.) Makes sense. I think I found a few other problems in ours as well. How does this look? [PATCH] RISC-V documentation cleanups