public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,	libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Deprecating arithmetic on std::atomic<void*>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420095205.GG3412@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc6cacc3-5cec-7148-a46a-057447a9e5e6@redhat.com>

On 20/04/17 11:43 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>On 04/20/2017 11:25 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>>>I mean, with -pedantic-errors we already error on void * arighmetics
>>>or function pointer arithmetics.  If std::atomic<void*> would use
>>>the void * arithmetics, it would also reject it.  Or does it use integer
>>>arithmetics instead?
>>
>>No, it does it on void*, but the __atomic built-ins still perform that
>>arithmetic even with -pedantic-errors.
>
>sizeof is not defined for the relevant types, either, and already 
>triggers a warning by default:
>
>t.cc:25:58: warning: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to a void type 
>[-Wpointer-arith]
>   _M_type_size(ptrdiff_t __d) const { return __d * sizeof(_PTp); }

That could be easily avoided if we care about supporting arithmetic on
std::atomic<void*>.

>I think the actual problem here is the suppression of warnings from 
>system headers.

The atomic built-ins still don't warn even with -Wsystem-headers


  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-20  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-19 17:07 Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-19 17:43 ` Ville Voutilainen
2017-04-20  6:19 ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-20  9:18   ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20  9:21     ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-20  9:25       ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20  9:30         ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20  9:30         ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-20  9:43         ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-20  9:52           ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2017-04-20  9:57             ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-20 10:03               ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20 10:07                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-20 10:12                   ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20 11:20                     ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20 12:20                       ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20  9:22     ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20  9:25       ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-20  9:31         ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20  9:39           ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20  9:49             ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-20  9:53               ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-20 11:29             ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-20  9:31   ` Marc Glisse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170420095205.GG3412@redhat.com \
    --to=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).