From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@cavium.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Question about -fopt-info output (-fopt-info vs. -fopt-info-all)
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 21:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201705022140.v42LePNH012760@sellcey-dt.caveonetworks.com> (raw)
I have a question about -fopt-info. According to the GCC documentation at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Dump-examples.html
| If options is omitted, it defaults to all-all, which means dump all
| available optimization info from all the passes. In the following example,
| all optimization info is output on to stderr.
|
| gcc -O3 -fopt-info
But when I use the '-fopt-info' flag, I get less output about vectorization
than when I use '-fopt-info-all' or '-fopt-info-all-all'.
For example if I compile:
int foo(int *a, int *b, int *c, int n) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
a[i] = b[i] + c[i];
}
with '-O3 -fopt-info' I get 6 lines of output. '-O3 -fopt-info-all'
or '-O3 -fopt-info-all-all' gives me 453 lines of output.
Is the documentation wrong, the implementation wrong, or my understanding
of what the documentation is saying wrong?
Steve Ellcey
sellcey@cavium.com
next reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-02 21:40 Steve Ellcey [this message]
2017-05-03 9:51 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201705022140.v42LePNH012760@sellcey-dt.caveonetworks.com \
--to=sellcey@cavium.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).