From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130610 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2019 06:53:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 130601 invoked by uid 89); 10 Aug 2019 06:53:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*Ad:U*amodra, HX-Languages-Length:482 X-HELO: bastet.se.axis.com Received: from bastet.se.axis.com (HELO bastet.se.axis.com) (195.60.68.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 06:53:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bastet.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01055182E3; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:53:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Axis-User: NO X-Axis-NonUser: YES Received: from bastet.se.axis.com ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bastet.se.axis.com [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LfcZa_p_Lab0; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:53:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from boulder02.se.axis.com (boulder02.se.axis.com [10.0.8.16]) by bastet.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4029E18571; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:53:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from boulder02.se.axis.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0421C1A069; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:53:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from boulder02.se.axis.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF7B1A067; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:53:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thoth.se.axis.com (unknown [10.0.2.173]) by boulder02.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:53:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ignucius.se.axis.com (ignucius.se.axis.com [10.88.21.50]) by thoth.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DD115C; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:53:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ignucius.se.axis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ignucius.se.axis.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Debian-2woody1) with ESMTP id x7A6rkDk015523; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:53:46 +0200 Received: (from hp@localhost) by ignucius.se.axis.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Debian-2woody1) id x7A6rjhE015519; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:53:45 +0200 Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 06:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201908100653.x7A6rjhE015519@ignucius.se.axis.com> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org CC: amodra@gmail.com, joern.rennecke@riscy-ip.com Subject: Using gcc/ChangeLog instead of gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 Has there been a change of policy so it's a valid option to use gcc/ChangeLog for testsuite changes? I was about to move a semi-randomly spotted misplaced entry, and when checking if there were others, I noticed that there's like tens of them, so I thought better ask. (IMHO it's confusing to have to inspect more than one ChangeLog, but I'm not going to bother changing anything if that's not the common view.) brgds, H-P