From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82629 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2019 11:39:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 82614 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2019 11:39:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=descriptions, blame, werent, weren't X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 11:39:44 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3781918641; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 11:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-139.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.139]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 521BA60BE2; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 11:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x89BdbLW022780; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:39:38 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x89BdZT8022779; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:39:35 +0200 Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 11:39:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Martin =?utf-8?B?TGnFoWth?= Cc: Marek Polacek , Richard Biener , Jonathan Wakely , Nathan Sidwell , Iain Sandoe , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , David Edelsohn , Jan Hubicka , GCC Patches , Jason Merrill Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update comment of removed options. Message-ID: <20190909113935.GR2120@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <6df2c495-c922-e6b6-abf7-ef3879ed9fda@suse.cz> <3d69fc9b-6a25-5a7c-1574-599b253a4c64@suse.cz> <20190906144853.GD14737@redhat.com> <20190906145640.GI2120@tucnak> <20190909110819.GQ2120@tucnak> <6cd9a43d-2241-3314-7f14-3f6bcab1ad73@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6cd9a43d-2241-3314-7f14-3f6bcab1ad73@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:24:53PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > You are right. What about the suggested patch? Can you please quickly (say with svn blame) double check whether the descriptions weren't actually right but misleading (an option could be deprecated in N and removed in N+1 or so, so see if it has been actually removed in the GCC release mentioned in there, rather than deprecated and removed later)? Ok with that. Perhaps it would be desirable to also rename the Deprecated keyword in *.opt to Removed and adjust documentation, but that can be handled separately. Jakub