From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 85622 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2019 09:11:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 85613 invoked by uid 89); 21 Sep 2019 09:11:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=our X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 09:11:05 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x8L9Ax49011293; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 04:10:59 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id x8L9Axed011292; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 04:10:59 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 09:11:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Jeff Law Cc: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT Message-ID: <20190921091058.GV9749@gate.crashing.org> References: <1685e719-738f-dd4e-c39c-c08e495b202e@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:49:36AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > With the SVN repo going read-only it becomes our fallback plan in case > of major unexpected problems. > > Joseph's recommendation for having the old objects/refs in the new repo > makes a lot of sense. So if it works, it's got my support as well. That potentially (and probably) makes the repository a lot bigger. Better test that before deciding to do this. > Anyway, just wanted to chime in with my support for the plan and make it > clear that as long as we get a conversion that is as good as or better > than the mirror is now that I'll be happy :-) Yup. And if everyone would use it, that already makes it better than the mirror. Segher