From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92450 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2019 14:05:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 92439 invoked by uid 89); 16 Dec 2019 14:05:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=delays, HX-Languages-Length:753 X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:05:24 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id xBGE5Gat024514; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 08:05:16 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id xBGE5EkX024510; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 08:05:14 -0600 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:05:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: "Eric S. Raymond" Cc: Mark Wielaard , Joseph Myers , Maxim Kuvyrkov , "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT Message-ID: <20191216140514.GD3152@gate.crashing.org> References: <1685e719-738f-dd4e-c39c-c08e495b202e@arm.com> <9E009921-96EA-44A2-A06A-232711227E69@linaro.org> <20191216133632.GC3152@gate.crashing.org> <20191216135451.GA3142@thyrsus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191216135451.GA3142@thyrsus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 08:54:51AM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Segher Boessenkool : > > > Do people really want to keep tweaking the conversions and postpone the > > > git switchover? > > > > No. > > It may not be my place to say, but...I think the stakes are pretty > high here. If I were a GCC developer, I think I'd want the best > possible conversion even if that takes a little longer. Most of us are perfectly happy even with the current git mirror, for old commits. We want "real" git to make the workflow for new commits better. No more delays, _please_. If the reposurgeon conversion is not ready now, then it is too late to be selected. Segher