From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 98262 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2020 15:39:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98253 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jan 2020 15:39:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=underline, HX-Languages-Length:844, H*MI:sk:b31c83f, H*i:sk:b31c83f X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (207.211.31.81) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:39:15 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579621153; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8+dCEENHmB2DjEnx2RTx2qhzt1huIRhkBKvoXIa40qE=; b=KSRWQ/l8Z9vxiw4dSrQ1st3oUDw/MAYjknsmcg0azB40XNgs/ta2KXb/s6+66F2NAWdQQY ZPWfdchTDUj5TosGQH8JSvifYWUWw7aoUJkn/KgCZ7lExez+q/vFTlTzfSDqekr062xZpv 1+dShsO6nU8/XNATut2Ju+YBxuVbOm8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-17-piuH3LwWOYiZALqYOlt-3g-1; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:39:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9871118A8C97; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-51.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.51]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E21B7DB5D; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 00LFd3ZQ016435; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:39:03 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 00LFd26f016434; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:39:02 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:38:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Development Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Message-ID: <20200121153902.GY10088@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <353faf3e-bf43-eb4d-542d-45a53dce77b2@arm.com> <20200121150440.GX10088@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00376.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 03:33:22PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > Some examples would be useful I'd say, e.g. it is unclear in what way y= ou > > want the PR number to be appended, shall it be > > something: whatever words describe it PR12345 > > or > > something: whatever words describe it (PR12345) > > or > > something: whatever words describe it: PR12345 > > or > > something: whatever words describe it [PR12345] > > or something else? >=20 > Glibc use "[BZ #nnnn]" - obviously BZ becomes PR, but after that, I'm not > too worried. I'd be happy with [PR #nnnn], but if folk want something el= se, > please say so quickly... [PR 12345] or [PR #12345] is bad, because the bugzilla won't underline it, it needs to be either PR12345 word, or PR component/12345 . Jakub