From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23642 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2020 09:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23620 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2020 09:38:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:2bee546, H*MI:sk:2bee546, H*f:sk:2bee546 X-HELO: us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) (205.139.110.61) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:38:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579685923; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WPjXvpVqqP5JXCylqOU09J8e158DposUqOSLfXWXa4I=; b=EhDx0SoLDpWeEHPXz6qbYQ7P59uMZxhRQrb4QX/VZPgaOet+3oIbmL5421P4Qk/GILRTmr URvaydRogxxR9YQJtYqgwzXLgUD2a7vkZklYWDWE61iFx/HDDYVZimGn8sfYn6rsXstdjc iXE5q7WRHHi3AyeQk/66acxxsr8UAdM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-200-BOqT2LK9Miyi4q86w1vnfw-1; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 04:38:40 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63DD1005516; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-51.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.51]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C21F7DB34; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 00M9cZ7r006407; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:38:36 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 00M9cYgs006406; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:38:34 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 13:54:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" Cc: Jason Merrill , Gerald Pfeifer , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Development Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Message-ID: <20200122093834.GH10088@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <353faf3e-bf43-eb4d-542d-45a53dce77b2@arm.com> <20200121150440.GX10088@tucnak> <20200121153902.GY10088@tucnak> <4d99536c-c1af-b4ea-17b0-23b44a3bf8b7@arm.com> <20200122090703.GG10088@tucnak> <2bee546f-4448-c1bb-94fa-cf4150dd88b2@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2bee546f-4448-c1bb-94fa-cf4150dd88b2@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00396.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 09:35:31AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 22/01/2020 09:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 06:50:13PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrot= e: > > > > Doesn't this use of [] have the same problem with git am? > > >=20 > > > No, because only 'leading' [] blocks are removed - git mailinfo --help > >=20 > > I've used > > openmp: Teach omp_code_to_statement about rest of OpenMP statements [PR= 93329] > > as the first line of a commit log and that [PR93329] part is completely= gone > > from it. >=20 > How did you apply the patch? Just git commit -a and editing the log message. But I got the [PR.....] not eaten in another commit, so ignore the above for now (although I'm very much convinced it was in there when I wrote the commit log). Jakub