From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32058 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2020 16:00:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32020 invoked by uid 89); 7 Feb 2020 16:00:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:00beacd, H*MI:sk:00beacd, H*f:sk:00beacd X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 16:00:41 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 017G0acv026554; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:00:36 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 017G0Ztd026553; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:00:35 -0600 Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 16:00:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" Cc: Richard Biener , Jeff Law , Richard Sandiford , "H.J. Lu" , paul@mad-scientist.net, GCC Development Subject: Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Message-ID: <20200207160035.GQ22482@gate.crashing.org> References: <20200205211801.GV22482@gate.crashing.org> <7743417118d2067cf0e9e1b840564f9f2d5e72dc.camel@redhat.com> <20200206135101.GY22482@gate.crashing.org> <20200206222548.GH22482@gate.crashing.org> <20200207134804.GN22482@gate.crashing.org> <20200207153247.GO22482@gate.crashing.org> <00beacd8-1248-f73d-5c9c-22f4f126a6ed@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00beacd8-1248-f73d-5c9c-22f4f126a6ed@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:43:05PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 07/02/2020 15:32, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:56:08PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > >>Any script should, in addition to extracting the author and email also > >>grep for "Co-authored-by:" annotations and add those as additional > >>contributors, of course. > > > >Is there no existing established practice for that? (Or is this it and > >so infrquent that I never have seen it :-) ) > > It's a convention (much like signed-off-by, etc). But it's fairly > widely accepted. Apparently it is mainly a github thing. > In the git conversion we added fields for it where we > detected co-authorship in the ChangeLog entries. Git has no specific > field for recording additional authors, Yup. I think in the future we will see a lot more Suggested-by: and Reviewed-by: and Tested-by: and the like, and less of what we now mark as co-authoring (also because there will be more smaller commits). Segher