From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68571 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2020 12:48:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 68532 invoked by uid 89); 6 Mar 2020 12:48:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:_ADVSQG, H*i:sk:A@mail., H*i:sk:_ADVSQG, urgent X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (207.211.31.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:48:01 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583498880; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/TBGoZdfx16/OSyVY3Zu1bwhwMzPA8oVLdnw8G7oevY=; b=Glgz2ebQ6DBmtOWvrMqTFEzVC67nU56CWl87ySvMsSxuB0wuE3/qTxZAOoId25QvSz2yN9 8xwDcQqXfrM5ZvP7MOs+ejZrRZiIywmuqfDyywmma1w3MRzsnDl6f/QufScbHc8cAgl8hZ A7HD5kJ9KsIUpQQjIb9Qt+8Gct1QpFQ= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-225-ydHvT9TaN-OVOSR_bdBTlg-1; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 07:47:56 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964861005509; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-37.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.37]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284785D9CD; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 026Clrui011673; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:47:53 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 026Clpnl011672; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:47:51 +0100 Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:48:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches Subject: Re: GCC 9.3 Status Report (2020-03-05) Message-ID: <20200306124751.GK2156@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20200305202246.GB2021@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-03/txt/msg00064.txt On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 12:35:09PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > The GCC 9 branch is now frozen for blocking regressions and documentati= on > > fixes only, all changes to the branch require a RM approval now. >=20 > I'd also like to backport this one: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-03/msg00360.html >=20 > It only affects the testsuite (and only for *-*-mingw* targets), but > ensures we don't get FAILs caused by the tests hitting a different > bug. >=20 > Fixing that other bug will happen for 9.4, but we can avoid the > failures with a small tweak to the tests, so they still verify what > was intended. On the other hand, some failing tests won't actually > hurt the quality of the 9.3 release, so it's not important. I think this isn't urgent enough and can wait for 9.4. We don't guarantee zero FAILs... Jakub