From: Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RMS removed from the GCC Steering Committee (was: Remove RMS...)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 01:11:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210401011133.00001e9c@tesio.it> (raw)
Hi David, thanks for sharing!
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:27:29 -0400 David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
> In 2012 RMS was added to the GCC Steering Committee web page
> based on his role in the GNU Project [...]
> we are removing him from the page.
I have to admit that I had never carefully observed the list of members
of the GCC steering committee. As I explained before in this thread,
the presence of Stallman gave me enough reassurance that GCC would have
honoured the values of Free Software.
As I said, enough to chose to port GCC to Jehanne instead of another
C compiler, in the hope to contribute back the port upstream, to GNU.
But now that I'm comparing the old web page [1] and the new one [2],
I realized something entirely new to me.
10 out of 13 members of the GCC steering committee work either for
American corporations (8), their subsidiaries (1) or an American
University (1) recently covered by the press in India [3].
Also, 4 of these work for the same corporation (IBM / Red Hat).
The other 3 are from German GmbH (2) or from a Nederlands public agency.
To me, and to billions of people, this shows a huge cultural bias.
Even ignoring the huge, unfair and invisible influence that such
American companies could have on the project development, even ignoring
that so many members are subject to the same Law (a Law that includes
the US Cloud Act, FISA, PPD 128, E.O. 12333, etc) decades after the
Thompson's lecture on trust in compilers development [4], the sole fact
that a single culture and economy can influence so heavily GCC
development through its leaders decisions should be fixed.
GCC is an international project.
I didn't saw this before because I trusted RMS to defend Free Software
values at any cost, but now I do not even need to recall my previous
adventures with Google and Software Freedom Conservancy to see a huge
risk not only to contribute to GCC development, but to rely on GCC.
Just like the Galactic President in The Hitchhiker's Guide, our trust
in RMS was distracting all of us from the very real and very dangerous
geopolitical-diversity issue in GCC leadership.
I'm afraid that if you wanted to attract more developers by cutting
GCC's ties with Stallman, you just proved that he was not even enough.
The GCC Steering Committee doesn't look more inclusive, without RMS.
On the contrary, it reveals itself as very "exclusive" to the world.
Please, fix it.
Giacomo
[1]
http://web.archive.org/web/20210330171044/https://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html
[2]
http://web.archive.org/web/20210331192841/https://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html
[3]
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/twitter-faceoff-rutgers-university-backs-controversial-historian-audrey-truschke-netizens-react/articleshow/81412939.cms
[4]
https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-thompson.pdf
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-31 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-31 23:11 Giacomo Tesio [this message]
2021-03-31 23:35 ` Jeff Law
2021-04-01 0:04 ` Giacomo Tesio
2021-04-01 1:25 ` RMS removed from the GCC Steering Committee Thomas Rodgers
2021-04-02 10:05 ` Giacomo Tesio
2021-04-02 11:50 ` Christopher Dimech
2021-04-02 13:05 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-04-02 14:06 ` Giacomo Tesio
2021-04-02 14:39 ` Christopher Dimech
2021-04-02 21:25 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-04-03 17:31 ` Giacomo Tesio
2021-04-03 19:33 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-04-03 23:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-04-04 9:22 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-04-04 13:10 ` Giacomo Tesio
2021-04-04 13:49 ` Richard Kenner
2021-04-04 14:38 ` Giacomo Tesio
2021-04-04 17:59 ` Richard Kenner
2021-04-04 14:40 ` Christopher Dimech
2021-04-04 22:53 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-04-04 1:08 ` David Edelsohn
2021-04-01 9:13 ` RMS removed from the GCC Steering Committee (was: Remove RMS...) Jonathan Wakely
2021-04-01 9:23 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-04-03 0:22 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2021-04-01 8:06 ` RMS removed from the GCC Steering Committee Andrea Corallo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210401011133.00001e9c@tesio.it \
--to=giacomo@tesio.it \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).