From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 4.mo2.mail-out.ovh.net (4.mo2.mail-out.ovh.net [87.98.172.75]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 567773858D33 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:07:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 567773858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tesio.it Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=giacomo@tesio.it Received: from player726.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.110.115.215]) by mo2.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53FE204797 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 16:07:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tesio.it (93-41-149-224.ip82.fastwebnet.it [93.41.149.224]) (Authenticated sender: giacomo@tesio.it) by player726.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E96531CA5E4C8; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-97G002f1a1c0e7-8dd0-4c96-814b-74b12fb70758, 6C0F1C2B153A8B77D4F057E071F6A76DCB403E10) smtp.auth=giacomo@tesio.it X-OVh-ClientIp: 93.41.149.224 Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 16:06:45 +0200 From: Giacomo Tesio To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: Thomas Rodgers , Nathan Sidwell , JeanHeyd Meneide , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: RMS removed from the GCC Steering Committee Message-ID: <20210402160645.000029d6@tesio.it> In-Reply-To: References: <20210401011133.00001e9c@tesio.it> <20210401020415.00002c77@tesio.it> <20210402120541.000068a5@tesio.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 2669508683335593545 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeiiedgjedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfgjfhggtgfgsehtjeertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefiihgrtghomhhoucfvvghsihhouceoghhirggtohhmohesthgvshhiohdrihhtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgieekgeelkeevhedtieevueevvedvkeevkeegvddvvdeghfetudejtdetgeeigeenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpleefrdeguddrudegledrvddvgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdqohhuthdphhgvlhhopehplhgrhigvrhejvdeirdhhrgdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhirggtohhmohesthgvshhiohdrihhtpdhrtghpthhtohepghgttgesghgttgdrghhnuhdrohhrgh X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 14:07:13 -0000 Dear Jonathan, everybody can see it... On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:05:10 +0100 Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 at 11:06, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > > But from outside your "cultural bubble", we all see that a bunch of > > highly controversial [3][4] US corporations (with long term ties > > with the USA DoD [5]) are kicking out of the GCC Steering Committee > > their only connection with both the FSF and the GNU project. > > If that's what you think happened, you've not been paying attention to > this thread. ...I wrote such a long mail, full of references to so many passages of your mails in these threads... without paying attention to them. What a lucky guy, I am! :-D > The SC just did was they were requested to do by (some > of) the developers of the project. Yeah, "some of". In this specific moment, when a global (and well financed) mob is attacking RMS personally, for anything they can frame as mischief, you were fine to comply with what "some of the developers" asked. What about the others? Did you consider that many of them might be to scared to oppose? Yet my request is not about Stallman, but about the Steering Committee. Please fix the huge global hazard that his removal uncovered. Giacomo