From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vlsi1.gnat.com (vlsi1.gnat.com [IPv6:2620:20:4000:0:250:56ff:fe95:277b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3793857C63 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 20:13:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6E3793857C63 Received: by vlsi1.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 3004) id 22AF733CAE; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:13:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:13:24 EDT To: giacomo@tesio.it Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, jwakely.gcc@gmail.com, pankaj@codeisgreat.org, rodgert@appliantology.com In-Reply-To: <24086410-E4B4-4F87-A91F-53880B96FB85@tesio.it> References: <20210407162454.GA22759@jocasta.intra> <20210408064528.GA10349@jocasta.intra> <94ca414af699bab851008f86f006db4bd8bf1929.camel@redhat.com> <20210408182128.GA19715@jocasta.intra> <5f532c131146b9c7549f03eac7a9da3a29db1a2e.camel@redhat.com> <20210409063749.GA8596@jocasta.intra> <04fa3173-9809-b905-8fa3-f6554b8ae7d7@hesbynett.no> <06eb8287-e6bb-270f-e5a5-730c10bb31ef@hesbynett.no> <20210409183631.GA29274@jocasta.intra> <69BA3B4D-C798-4700-B607-994588BD5D87@tesio.it> <3152a2058548d29589d2cead0c22038e@appliantology.com> <24086410-E4B4-4F87-A91F-53880B96FB85@tesio.it> Message-Id: <20210410201324.22AF733CAE@vlsi1.gnat.com> From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3489.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 20:13:28 -0000 > But it's quite obvious, after you removed RMS's oversight on SC's decisions. The SC is the "GNU maintainer" for GCC. The GNU project has oversight on the maintainers of every GNU project, including GCC. The change to the web page didn't affect that: RMS still has oversight on the SC's decisions to some extent, just like he does over all GNU projects.