From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CB2382D501 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 17:43:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C8CB2382D501 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 24KHgpwc017781; Fri, 20 May 2022 12:42:51 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 24KHgov5017779; Fri, 20 May 2022 12:42:50 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 12:42:50 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Paul E Murphy Cc: Nicholas Piggin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC Linux patch] powerpc: add documentation for HWCAPs Message-ID: <20220520174250.GG25951@gate.crashing.org> References: <20220520051528.98097-1-npiggin@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 17:43:53 -0000 On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 09:21:43AM -0500, Paul E Murphy wrote: > >+PPC_FEATURE_HAS_ALTIVEC > >+ Vector (aka Altivec, VSX) facility is available. > > I think "(aka Altivec, VSX)" might be more accurately stated as "(aka > Altivec)"? "Also known as AltiVec or VMX", yes. > >+PPC_FEATURE_HAS_DFP > >+ DFP facility is available. > > Maybe something like "Decimal floating point instructions are available > to userspace. Individual instruction availability is dependent on the > reported architecture version."? That is true for *all* facilities, and even the base architecture! This is not only hypothetical, either. Segher