From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Problems when building NT kernel drivers with GCC / LD
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 02:26:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221105012652.e4x5xm7lhrd4rgbn@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221105005749.3ultigucvhqoikvx@pali>
On Saturday 05 November 2022 01:57:49 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 31 October 2022 10:55:59 Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 30.10.2022 02:06, Pali Rohár via Binutils wrote:
> > > * GCC or LD (not sure who) sets memory alignment characteristics
> > > (IMAGE_SCN_ALIGN_MASK) into the sections of PE executable binary.
> > > These characteristics should be only in COFF object files, not
> > > executable binaries. Specially they should not be in NT kernel
> > > drivers.
> >
> > Like Martin pointed out in reply for another item, I'm pretty sure
> > this one was taken care of in bfd already (and iirc is in 2.39). You
> > fail to mention at all what versions of the various components you
> > use.
>
> Ou, sorry for that. I take care to write issues in all details and
> totally forgot to write such important information like tool versions.
>
> Now I retested all issues on Debian 11 which has LD 2.35.2 and GCC
> 10.2.1 and all issues are there still valid except data characteristic
> IMAGE_SCN_CNT_INITIALIZED_DATA for code sections IMAGE_SCN_CNT_CODE.
>
> I can easily retest it with LD 2.39 and GCC 10.3.0 which is in Debian
> testing.
Retested with LD 2.39 and GCC 10.3.0 which is in Debian testing and
following problems are additionally fixed: --exclude-all-symbols,
--dynamicbase and IMAGE_SCN_ALIGN_MASK (which you mentioned above). All
other still reminds.
Do you need some other information?
> > I guess before reporting such a long list of issue you would
> > have wanted to test at least with the most recent releases of each
> > of the involved components. I wouldn't exclude some further items
> > could then be scratched off your list.
> >
> > Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-05 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-30 0:06 Pali Rohár
2022-10-30 7:06 ` [Mingw-w64-public] " Martin Storsjö
2022-10-30 19:58 ` ralph engels
2022-10-31 9:55 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-05 0:57 ` Pali Rohár
2022-11-05 1:26 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2022-11-20 13:10 ` Pali Rohár
2022-11-21 7:24 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-26 19:04 ` Pali Rohár
2022-11-28 8:07 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-28 8:40 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-11-28 9:06 ` Jan Beulich
2022-12-26 10:47 ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-03 11:06 ` Nick Clifton
2023-02-20 18:25 ` Pali Rohár
2023-04-01 9:23 ` Pali Rohár
2023-04-12 9:53 ` Nick Clifton
2023-04-12 20:40 ` Pali Rohár
2024-01-07 1:55 ` Pali Rohár
2024-04-07 23:20 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221105012652.e4x5xm7lhrd4rgbn@pali \
--to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).