From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=0pSD=36=schemamania.org=jklowden@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail.schemamania.org (rrcs-50-75-19-234.nys.biz.rr.com [50.75.19.234])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0286F3858D1E
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:50:28 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0286F3858D1E
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=schemamania.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=schemamania.org
Received: from oak.schemamania.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by mail.schemamania.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084DB256FB72;
	Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:18:29 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:18:28 -0500
From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden@schemamania.org>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: access to include path in front end
Message-Id: <20221130121828.6f65f90211b85a637f073dc4@schemamania.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc21hWaTUnYHWYiErGhkYcHuhek8wOPaKpadwCQ8+W_VTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20221129100804.c5b3e5bc669ff92f2100c3a3@schemamania.org>
	<CAFiYyc21hWaTUnYHWYiErGhkYcHuhek8wOPaKpadwCQ8+W_VTQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.3 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64--netbsd)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>

On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:49:35 +0100
Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I would like to use the -I option to pass the names of copybook
> > directories to the cobol front end.  A bit of exploration yesterday
> > left me with the sense that the -I argument, in C at least, is not
> > passed to the compiler, but to the preprocessor. Access to
> > -fmax-errors I think I've figured out, but -I is a mystery.
> 
> The frontends have access to the set of passed options via the
> option processing langhooks (and there's also global_options
> and global_options_set), -I would be the OPT_I option (currently
> only enabled for some frontends, you can add that in your
> language specific .opt file).  The set of include directories is
> not in any way special here.

Thanks for clearing that up for me, Richard.  I somehow got the
impression that the langhooks were needed only for adding options
specific to the language.  

--jkl