From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506053858D28 for ; Sat, 6 May 2023 10:45:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 506053858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-94f910ea993so421587266b.3 for ; Sat, 06 May 2023 03:45:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683369907; x=1685961907; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bvcEjyfWgcNeFomApjkz4yFnOjrxg/2TjvhtwT6Oh0c=; b=dFsswPYFPxjl5mxgbnw5mJbrK8KOpPjkWzNjLIJxpz9Lj09Loh3PzR53EFmICfX5Pm 7+omfoDY/kqxRCuWWa0qrJ+50Pi50nLxZYNS8Ly7mQnxELvIaorO8YUlFpPF7QM/uASf 6HyCtK7LEReuejActqsl1yWFbr6rVhujoNV2mJMX+npC7NyUw/htzCQME1D9R1JHViEe +xPrk4R9ZpchTEN4atL9AnrwjVxVjTi18ZVoicoUOVx8+Jv1KJI0v8mj3UzvDakPW6Pw 4GjTzLwDPZIPehuTwkpBrQjllBs9rPH2MzKpb2+N7e+NbqSnWuwYZvWzNqkQwY9dFHBE bEbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683369907; x=1685961907; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=bvcEjyfWgcNeFomApjkz4yFnOjrxg/2TjvhtwT6Oh0c=; b=bDVnuh1/XGclDEAnagvltBGqzsIBNjP4KG4onR59iFqqiXiqZEsfoLH35JFrcc4CdZ NoM2hn/d62qNa2JK313dNwSeyCzNPHdQ2cvsV54Dxe8hAuf3cin1KA/DNzP1/9madiFF hSrxPK3aM+wA+3wz9FnQQsM58otvw1Ef90f3mMLnQ+TpY+VCVKHNfh5gjhU4QzwQUuFQ UEUHSsvx0l0icPtQbICA8wDGOrI2jnEeN92o5Lf72I1FWcm8lRp8iD+Iud+juq39wGOu bXyMryXiW6G14N+W8e/JwOlj7ob4w8sA5DQ+VDGamEq146WFOS5UGZwDE69s5qqA1ESW GDgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxM5HWrRXBHogvD6FrytkL8u6gXxwWr8tXSv26rJ+na+FsI+0M2 KbHrzVMJgneeOEBnCJQ29pVTDGyMYys= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ69mGXBkCxfwMR6Xre0440zJ8r6J2Cfqmp+Cj+Atlb9akGdALVNf/BY2/SVXovUVPP7vWrkbQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7949:b0:94a:62e7:70e1 with SMTP id l9-20020a170906794900b0094a62e770e1mr3802663ejo.68.1683369906731; Sat, 06 May 2023 03:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pali ([2a02:2b88:6:5cc6::2f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gx11-20020a1709068a4b00b00965a52d2bf6sm2131196ejc.88.2023.05.06.03.45.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 06 May 2023 03:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 12:45:04 +0200 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net, LIU Hao Subject: Re: gcc parameter -mcrtdll= for choosing Windows C RunTime DLL library Message-ID: <20230506104504.3pqi7mgcygvzs6db@pali> References: <20221120125348.a6xh7kxmvrimse72@pali> <20221204121622.qsaxlp2245h6pxz2@pali> <417329c3-dae7-b220-0d22-52f866fdf687@126.com> <20230421162328.vn3wtgymnsxrbcgd@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230421162328.vn3wtgymnsxrbcgd@pali> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Friday 21 April 2023 18:23:28 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 04 December 2022 20:48:30 LIU Hao wrote: > > 在 2022-12-04 20:16, Pali Rohár via Gcc 写道: > > > Hello! I would like to ask gcc people, what do you think about such > > > proposed -mcrtdll= parameter? > > > > > > There are lot of unofficial gcc patches which implement this -mcrtdll= > > > parameter and this parameter is present in more gcc forks. > > > So it looks like that this parameter is useful for more people. > > > > > > > I vote +1 for this in GCC 14. > > > > GCC 13 (i.e. current master branch) is at stage3 so it's not an option at this moment. > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > LIU Hao > > > > Hello! If I'm looking correctly, gcc 13 was already branched. So what > revisiting this -mcrtdll= parameter now? Hello! I would like to remind this -mcrtdll= support for gcc.