From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=U3g9=BD=klomp.org=mark@sourceware.org>
Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53E653858D35
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 14 May 2023 12:35:12 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 53E653858D35
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org
Received: by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4D36A313ACB3; Sun, 14 May 2023 14:35:11 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 14:35:11 +0200
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
Cc: Gabriel Ravier <gabravier@gmail.com>,
	Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: More C type errors by default for GCC 14
Message-ID: <20230514123511.GJ13088@gnu.wildebeest.org>
References: <57238276-5966-98d6-d5f0-f5451013ed17@gmail.com>
 <871qjned25.fsf@yahoo.com>
 <67e65b41-5400-d1c2-9f43-f94d0ea7da9b@gmail.com>
 <87wn1fcrw4.fsf@yahoo.com>
 <4d2af697-2f28-9e17-6b35-3a4ba19313d2@gmail.com>
 <87mt2ab8te.fsf@yahoo.com>
 <f173e0cb-7fde-314e-937b-8c9575ac1c47@gmail.com>
 <87h6si9jn0.fsf@yahoo.com>
 <b71bf6a2-2527-e970-f46c-ea6116d694d3@gmail.com>
 <87fs818xlx.fsf@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87fs818xlx.fsf@yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3029.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>

Hi Po,

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 09:53:30PM +0800, Po Lu via Gcc wrote:
> I don't want anything, seeing as I've been using GCC less and less over
> the years (for this and other reasons.)  I'm just throwing in my two or
> so cents.

I think you have contributed more than two cents and it time to stop
repeating your opinion over and over again (and for others to stop
replying to your posts). You have posted more than anybody else to
this thread and it is not contributing anything new. Please let the
actual gcc maintainers work out the technical details of the default
diagnostics.

Thanks,

Mark