From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=jVIL=B4=klomp.org=mark@sourceware.org>
Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D173858C62
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu,  8 Jun 2023 11:36:39 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 34D173858C62
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org
Received: by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 5781A313ACA3; Thu,  8 Jun 2023 13:36:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 13:36:38 +0200
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= <arsen@aarsen.me>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Will GCC eventually learn to use BSR or even TZCNT on AMD/Intel
 processors?
Message-ID: <20230608113638.GC5330@gnu.wildebeest.org>
References: <CAP2b4GO8H3bmWi-UPejmH6aFfyTArCucupvymxvuVpZ+5puh=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <386a1d9c18eb7af15eef409c36a196ec0f99ad22.camel@mad-scientist.net>
 <u5njs9$ab7$1@ciao.gmane.io>
 <CAGWvnyk49_CG0spdQ0i80rnnDUw9yxTaUwE2LYEZXYJfO7pZ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <86ttvk3006.fsf@aarsen.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <86ttvk3006.fsf@aarsen.me>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3029.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>

Hi Arsen,

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 08:43:05PM +0200, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
> IMO, the sparing usage of this power on what are clearly purely abusive
> participants can only drive away users and contributors.  It seems
> reasonable to establish a process for dealing with incidents like this
> (and appeals, of course), especially given their frecency.

I completely agree. Having a clear code of conduct for participants on
this list and procedures for when people don't stop harassing others
would be really welcome.

Thanks,

Mark