From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD38E3849ADC for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:28:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CD38E3849ADC Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org CD38E3849ADC Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713554923; cv=none; b=wPMzBN1yCTJDvMF2qrmP0wUCOTZFPVAnBZId6uXRESX1i9/GLwxlMmLx+8cbS453QqJwq3YMAhv332FSIU5rD3e+jHYaRV+VawTbBE5BoKc06FVQLc01Ov7K2rNQThk+R9rvWNXw6nHgmgNcQb9PuXe48fPWPxABwl67kPiPplQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713554923; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/q+ySmksuKlUpw3JOlmoIuEN7+BmYC+yTxw2AKOEqLc=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=d4xAMPzP+WqF/tpX0Hi0vIDWsuRX45YD+2rojSY14lV5n6k8bndiurzOtt3znXBOYYFYPZvhlu0cJfhzhD7Vb93W2RIjRQkM/31BNylT1ieW00uV4h/05X5sf5Hfj32l4KVmpOb/pWy3CS6V+WIZJpRMeOAe5E3I3MfpTXPE8No= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1713554921; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=COdIhtoVWGK7V/w81n2eumZxTEp5Q8naPR++YqN7GD0=; b=MsliE/4JSuAWTx1RWJr8puXbug2I4PIkcHEQWdRJDgoKpl/vUxM3K8VvoUmMSdXPP3Q1mK TFQ9AIMXFvzY8dMoJb3qRfJPeXjxqbGV+G/6CIBjQMd7a8aJJrGEWhPeZryMFeyJ9BEwxk ODuvBUCobiopn/kTAiWOF82wg211xAg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-118-L81vvxDyNOuoWNSC4_rvRw-1; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:28:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: L81vvxDyNOuoWNSC4_rvRw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99354803CA4; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.22.8.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885EC43FAD; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fche by redhat.com with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rxtuW-00070p-Fo; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:28:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:28:36 -0400 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: adacore git-hooks - daemon-mode email vs. systemd-logind linger Message-ID: <20240419192836.GH9069@redhat.com> References: <20240416105622.GD1423@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.5 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi, Joel - > [...] Thinking more long term, I think there are talks about using > a more comprehensive system for source and contribution management, > similar to products such as GitLab or GitHub. [...] (Yeah, but I wouldn't count on any of that in the medium term.) > [...] That's why I tend to think that, for the moment, > I'd go the simplest route overall: In this case, I think the simplest > is to just have a way to disable the daemon mode, and just have > the users wait. In the vast majority of cases, the wait will be > a few seconds. Even with a patch-series of a 100 patches, it would > mean a 1min40s wait. Very bearable. Right. the EMAIL_DELAY_IN_SECONDS time of 5s could be reduced to 1s, or even 0. - FChE