From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13933 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2002 16:13:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13817 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2002 16:13:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Oct 2002 16:13:26 -0000 Received: from warlock.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9PGAxg02064; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:10:59 -0700 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:25:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: Reichelt , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [Mainline regression] ICE when throwing strings Message-ID: <203470000.1035562259@warlock.codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200210251421.QAA49203@numa6.igpm.rwth-aachen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01531.txt.bz2 > > causes 3 regressions in the testsuite: > > FAIL: g++.eh/ctor1.C referenced below (test for errors, line 4) > FAIL: g++.eh/ctor1.C can't copy (test for errors, line 12) > FAIL: g++.eh/ctor1.C (test for excess errors) > > Should we prepare a patch to disable this optimization altogether > or rather wait for Jasons return? Those failures are pretty innocuous compared to the current state; they are just missed errors, as opposed to rejection of a valid program. And, they are already present if you use "-fno-elide-constructors" by hand. So, please go ahead and check in your patch, file a high-priority PR a bout the new problem (the ctor1.C failure), and make Jason aware of that new PR as well. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com