From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-92849-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13332 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2004 06:05:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13319 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 06:05:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp2.fuse.net) (216.68.8.172)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 06:05:51 -0000
Received: from dellpi.pinski.fam ([66.42.130.200]) by smtp2.fuse.net
          (InterMail vM.6.00.05.02 201-2115-109-103-20031105) with ESMTP
          id <20040317060548.LWJP19499.smtp2.fuse.net@dellpi.pinski.fam>;
          Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:05:48 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (IDENT:pinskia@localhost.pinski.fam [127.0.0.1])
	by dellpi.pinski.fam (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i2H65jxj026260;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:05:46 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <4057E7E7.7000907@codesourcery.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403150134120.32640@peem.als.lbl.gov> <4057E7E7.7000907@codesourcery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <20A91204-77D9-11D8-95E0-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, poschmid@lbl.gov, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
   Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 06:37:00 -0000
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00930.txt.bz2


On Mar 16, 2004, at 21:53, Mark Mitchell wrote:

>
>> 3) There are 10 failures while running the current boost regression 
>> test
>> suite. All of them might be regressions since gcc 3.3 accepts the 
>> code which
>> is rejected by gcc 3.4.  4) Some test examples of ACE and TAO fail.  
>> 5) Because of recent changes in libstdc++, current root snapshots no 
>> longer
>> compile. root_v3.10.02 is the last release which can be build 
>> successfully.
>>
> Until/unless you (or someone else!) does the analysis to figure out 
> why these tests are failing it's hard to say what these problems mean. 
>  The changes to G++ and V3 will undoubtedly make the compiler much 
> stricter.


The tests for ACE and TAO were filed and some of them have been fixed, 
I think the last
remaining one to be fixed is PR 14545.
I have not seen any libstdc++ regressions filed lately.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski