gcc 2.95.2

gcc 2.95.2

[EXT-MOORE, JERRY]

I downloaded your precompiled version of gcc on HP-UX 11.0 clean install.
I get the following error messages when trying to compile a simple 18 line
source which 
is a test.

# gcc -o rand rand.c
as: "/var/tmp/ccfeGsvc.s", line 25: error 1052: Directive name not
recognized -NSUBSPA
as: "/var/tmp/ccfeGsvc.s", line 61: warning 36: Use of %fr22L is incorrect
for the current LEVEL of 1.0
as: "/var/tmp/ccfeGsvc.s", line 63: warning 36: Use of %fr24L is incorrect
for the current LEVEL of 1.0
as: "/var/tmp/ccfeGsvc.s", line 64: warning 36: Use of %fr24L is incorrect
for the current LEVEL of 1.0
as: "/var/tmp/ccfeGsvc.s", line 64: warning 36: Use of %fr22L is incorrect
for the current LEVEL of 1.0
as: "/var/tmp/ccfeGsvc.s", line 64: warning 36: Use of %fr23 is incorrect
for the current LEVEL of 1.0
as: "/var/tmp/ccfeGsvc.s", line 64: warning 36: Use of XMPYU is incorrect
for the current LEVEL of 1.0
as: "/var/tmp/ccfeGsvc.s", line 65: warning 36: Use of %fr23L is incorrect
for the current LEVEL of 1.0



Source:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>

main()
{
        int i,y;
        int rand();
        int k;
        double x;

        srand(time(NULL));

        for (i = 1; i<7; i++)
        {
        printf("\nThe number is %d\n", rand()%55);
        }
}

Re: gcc 2.95.2

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jan 30, 2001, "EXT-MOORE, JERRY" <Jerry.Moore@SW.Boeing.com> wrote:

> I downloaded your precompiled version of gcc on HP-UX 11.0 clean install.

Not ours.  The GCC web site doesn't have any precompiled versions.  We
only offer sources.

> # gcc -o rand rand.c
> as: "/var/tmp/ccfeGsvc.s", line 25: error 1052: Directive name not
> recognized -NSUBSPA

The site from which you have downloaded the binaries probably mentions
that you have to download binutils too.  If it doesn't, please bug the
maintainer of that site.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

Re: gcc 2.95.2

[Joe Buck]

> I am planning to install gcc 2.95.2 on an IBM AIX server.  I am
> dowloading the gcc from the sunfreeware site.  Does gcc 2.95.2 works on
> IBM AIX server.

sunfreeware provides precompiled binaries for Solaris, not for IBM AIX,
so that isn't going to work.  But gcc does support AIX.

Please ask the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org list for assistance; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
is the compiler developers' list.

gcc 2.95.2

[Sally S Maznabi]

I am planning to install gcc 2.95.2 on an IBM AIX server.  I am dowloading the gcc from the sunfreeware site.  Does gcc 2.95.2 works on IBM AIX server.
Any information you can provide will be greatly appreicated.
 Thanks,   -Sally
323-259-4067

Re: gcc 2.95.2

[David Edelsohn]

>>>>> Sally S Maznabi writes:

Sally> I am planning to install gcc 2.95.2 on an IBM AIX server.  I am
Sally> dowloading the gcc from the sunfreeware site.  Does gcc 2.95.2 works on
Sally> IBM AIX server. 
Sally> Any information you can provide will be greatly appreicated.

	As Joe mentioned, the Sun website is for Sun Solaris binaries, not
AIX binaries.  Binaries of GCC for AIX are available from:

http://www-frec.bull.com/docs/download.htm

and

http://aixpdlib.seas.ucla.edu

David

GCC 2.95.2

[c958179]

 I am using gcc-2.95.2 to compile a c++ program. The program has been
 compiled and run with a egcs-1.1.2 compiler before.But when I try to
 compile the same program with gcc-2.95.2 I get errors like:

 ANCI C++ forbids declaration 'xxxx' with no type.
 and
 field 'xxxx' has incomplete type.

 What is the meaning of these errors?


In the source code(RigidBodyTrans.H) I am having the following
errors:
field 'rotate' has incomplete type
field 'translate' has incomplete type

And in the source code RAPID_PRIVATE, I am getting this error:

ANCI C++ forbids declaration 'RAPID_Collide' with no type.


Thank you


Sc.

GCC 2.95.2

[c958179]

I am using gcc-2.95.2 to compile a c++ program. The program has been
compiled and run with a egcs-1.1.2 compiler before.But when I try to
compile the same program with gcc-2.95.2 I get errors like:

ANCI C++ forbids declaration 'xxxx' with no type.
and
field 'xxxx' has incomplete type.

What is the meaning of these errors?

Are there something wrong with the program or with the compiler?

Thank you in advance.

Sc.

Re: GCC 2.95.2

[Bo Thorsen]

On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 c958179@student.dtu.dk wrote:

> 
> I am using gcc-2.95.2 to compile a c++ program. The program has been
> compiled and run with a egcs-1.1.2 compiler before.But when I try to
> compile the same program with gcc-2.95.2 I get errors like:
> 
> ANCI C++ forbids declaration 'xxxx' with no type.
> and
> field 'xxxx' has incomplete type.
> 
> What is the meaning of these errors?
> 
> Are there something wrong with the program or with the compiler?

Send some source code along with questions like this. That makes it a lot
easier to answer your questions.

Bo.

-- 

Bo Thorsen
bo@sonofthor.dk
Lahnsgade 31, st.
DK-5000 Odense C
Tlf: +45 66 11 83 85

Rule one of good programmers: anything You can do, I can do better
Rule two of good programmers: anything I can do, You can do better
The Programming Theorem: anything worth doing is worth doing over and over again

GCC 2.95.2

[c958179]

Why can't I use GCC 2.95.2 for a makefile with folloving condition:
I mean it exit.

target-dir:
	@if ( $(MAKE) -version 2>/dev/null | grep GNU > /dev/null ) ; then
\
		echo Gnumake. Excellent ; \
	else \
		echo This does not appear to be gnumake. ; \
		exit 1 ; \



Why is gcc-2.95.2 not fulfilling the condition?


Rb.

Re: GCC 2.95.2

[Erik Mouw]

On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 02:54:11PM +0100, c958179@student.dtu.dk wrote:
> Why can't I use GCC 2.95.2 for a makefile with folloving condition:
> I mean it exit.
> 
> target-dir:
> 	@if ( $(MAKE) -version 2>/dev/null | grep GNU > /dev/null ) ; then
> \
> 		echo Gnumake. Excellent ; \
> 	else \
> 		echo This does not appear to be gnumake. ; \
> 		exit 1 ; \
> 
> 
> 
> Why is gcc-2.95.2 not fulfilling the condition?

Because this has nothing to do with gcc. The makefile is complaining
about the fact that the "make" utility is not GNU make. Get GNU make
from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/make/ .


Erik

-- 
J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department
of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems,
Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031,  2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
Phone: +31-15-2783635  Fax: +31-15-2781843  Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl
WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/

Re: GCC 2.95.2

[Zack Weinberg]

On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:27:10PM +0100, Erik Mouw wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 02:54:11PM +0100, c958179@student.dtu.dk wrote:
> > Why can't I use GCC 2.95.2 for a makefile with folloving condition:
> > I mean it exit.
> > 
> > target-dir:
> > 	@if ( $(MAKE) -version 2>/dev/null | grep GNU > /dev/null ) ; then
> > \
> > 		echo Gnumake. Excellent ; \
> > 	else \
> > 		echo This does not appear to be gnumake. ; \
> > 		exit 1 ; \
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Why is gcc-2.95.2 not fulfilling the condition?
> 
> Because this has nothing to do with gcc. The makefile is complaining
> about the fact that the "make" utility is not GNU make. Get GNU make
> from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/make/ .

Also worth pointing out that you're missing a "fi" at the end of the
commands, which will make it barf no matter which version of make you have.

A better test for gnumake is: [cribbed from GNU libc's Makerules]

ifneq(,)
This makefile requires GNU Make.
endif

REQUIRED_MAKE_VERSION = 3.74	# Or whatever
REAL_MAKE_VERSION = $(firstword $(MAKE_VERSION))

ifneq ($(REQUIRED_MAKE_VERSION), \
       $(firstword $(sort $(REAL_MAKE_VERSION) $(REQUIRED_MAKE_VERSION))))
Wrong GNU Make version.  See above for the version needed.
endif

Or just name the makefile "GNUmakefile" and be done with it.

zw

gcc 2.95.2

[Michael Clifford]

Hello everyone,

I have one question. I am running RedHat 6.1 and decided to
update gcc. I downloaded gcc-2.95.2 source. 

I Then followed the install instructions to install a native
compiler. From the top level directory of the tarball I did:

mkdir objdir
cd objdir
./configure --prefix=/usr
make bootstrap

All that was fine and well. I then removed the egcs rpms from my
RH install. There were 3 of them.

I then did:
make install

Everything installed without a hitch. What I do notice now is
that when I run the configure script for any app, it tells me:

checking host system type... configure: error: can not guess
host type; you must specify one

I have never had this problem. How can I fix it to where
config.guess determines my host type again?

P.S - I am not on the list, so please forward to
michael@eternal-bliss.com

cliffom
-- 
Michael Clifford
http://www.eternal-bliss.com

"We can only learn so much and live." -- Thomas Harris

Re: gcc 2.95.2

[Michael Clifford]

I upgraded binutils to 2.10. Again, I removed the 2.9 rpm that
redhat installed. binutils 2.10 installed from source without a
hitch, but the configure scripts from all apps I download fail
to recognize my host type. I have to manually specify it by
saying:

./configure <my options> i686-pc-linux-gnu

Where i686-pc-linux-gnu is my HOST type. Any insight? Again,
please forward to michael@eternal-bliss.com since I am not on
the list.

On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:19:56 +0200, Jan Dvorak said:

> On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:03:41AM -0700, Michael Clifford wrote:
>  > Hello everyone,
>  > 
>  > I have one question. I am running RedHat 6.1 and decided to
>  > update gcc. I downloaded gcc-2.95.2 source. 
>  > 
>  > I Then followed the install instructions to install a native
>  > compiler. From the top level directory of the tarball I did:
>  > 
>  > mkdir objdir
>  > cd objdir
>  > ./configure --prefix=/usr
>  > make bootstrap
>  > 
>  > All that was fine and well. I then removed the egcs rpms from my
>  > RH install. There were 3 of them.
>  > 
>  > I then did:
>  > make install
>  > 
>  > Everything installed without a hitch. What I do notice now is
>  > that when I run the configure script for any app, it tells me:
>  > 
>  > checking host system type... configure: error: can not guess
>  > host type; you must specify one
>  > 
>  
>  Did you upgrade binutils ? config.guess uses them to see what system you are
>  running. With new binutils, output  format has changed, so you need to
>  obtain new config.guess and replace with it the older ones. I believe that
>  nearly all aplications now had the right config.guess.
>  
>  Jan Dvorak <johnydog@go.cz>
>  
>  

-- 
Michael Clifford
http://www.eternal-bliss.com

"We can only learn so much and live." -- Thomas Harris

Re: gcc 2.95.2

[Robert Boehne]

I had exactly this same problem, so couldn't we
assume that the problem is in binutils-2.10 ?

-- 
Robert Boehne             Software Engineer
Ricardo Software   Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238
FAX: (630)789-0127
email:  rboehne@ricardo-us.com

Re: gcc 2.95.2

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Oct  2, 2000, Michael Clifford <michael@eternal-bliss.com> wrote:

> checking host system type... configure: error: can not guess
> host type; you must specify one

The problem is that config.guess assumes the C compiler is named
`cc' unless you set the environment variable CC to the name of the
compiler.  When you removed the RPMs, you also removed the link `cc ->
gcc', that is installed by the RPM version, but not by the FSF GCC.
Just re-create the link and all will be fine.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

GCC 2.95.2

[Rainer Drath]

Can GNU C 2.95.2 compile PalmOS-Applications (*.prc) on a Windows machine?
Does anybody have gotten this into work? Perhaps the application for Windows
is available in a compiled status? Can anybody help me?

Thanks

Rainer Drath

GCC 2.95.2

[Dana, Eric]

I see that gcc 2.95.2 is available on ftp.gnu.org, but there was
no official announcement and the egcs page has not been updated. Is
this an official release or is the egcs page out of date?

--Eric Dana--

Re: GCC 2.95.2

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 618C9ED0E58FD211B19100A0C9EAF0CF1B7E8D@es01-bos >you write:
  > I see that gcc 2.95.2 is available on ftp.gnu.org, but there was
  > no official announcement and the egcs page has not been updated. Is
  > this an official release or is the egcs page out of date?
The official announcement hasn't gone out because the release is still
propagating to the mirrors.  That's also why you can't download it from
directly from gcc.gnu.org.  

jeff

Re: GCC 2.95.2

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 618C9ED0E58FD211B19100A0C9EAF0CF1B7E8D@es01-bos >you write:
  > I see that gcc 2.95.2 is available on ftp.gnu.org, but there was
  > no official announcement and the egcs page has not been updated. Is
  > this an official release or is the egcs page out of date?
The official announcement hasn't gone out because the release is still
propagating to the mirrors.  That's also why you can't download it from
directly from gcc.gnu.org.  

jeff

Re: GCC 2.95.2

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Oct 27, 1999, "Dana, Eric" <Eric_Dana@bmc.com> wrote:

> I see that gcc 2.95.2 is available on ftp.gnu.org, but there was
> no official announcement and the egcs page has not been updated. Is
> this an official release or is the egcs page out of date?

It is not official before it's announced :-)

But it will be as soon as it propagates to mirrors all over the world
and the announcement is posted.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva IC-Unicamp, Bra[sz]il
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br,guarana.{org,com}} aoliva@{acm,computer}.org
oliva@{gnu.org,kaffe.org,{egcs,sourceware}.cygnus.com,samba.org}
** I may forward mail about projects to mailing lists; please use them

Re: GCC 2.95.2

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Oct 27, 1999, "Dana, Eric" <Eric_Dana@bmc.com> wrote:

> I see that gcc 2.95.2 is available on ftp.gnu.org, but there was
> no official announcement and the egcs page has not been updated. Is
> this an official release or is the egcs page out of date?

It is not official before it's announced :-)

But it will be as soon as it propagates to mirrors all over the world
and the announcement is posted.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva IC-Unicamp, Bra[sz]il
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br,guarana.{org,com}} aoliva@{acm,computer}.org
oliva@{gnu.org,kaffe.org,{egcs,sourceware}.cygnus.com,samba.org}
** I may forward mail about projects to mailing lists; please use them

GCC 2.95.2

[Dana, Eric]

I see that gcc 2.95.2 is available on ftp.gnu.org, but there was
no official announcement and the egcs page has not been updated. Is
this an official release or is the egcs page out of date?

--Eric Dana--