From: Geert Bosch <bosch@gnat.com>
To: Oliver.Kellogg@t-online.de (Oliver Kellogg)
Cc: dewar@gnat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 22:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2144A4FB-4E8D-11D7-B872-00039344BF4A@gnat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18qJMd-24wHpoC@fwd07.sul.t-online.com>
On Tuesday, Mar 4, 2003, at 15:50 America/New_York, Oliver Kellogg
wrote:
> Would you consider inclusion into GNAT if someone implemented this?
Yes, in general, if the benefits (in measurable speedup) outweigh
the costs (speed degradation in single-unit case, maintainability
of the compiler, ...) of an optimization, it will be considered
for inclusion. Best would be to first post a design overview,
before doing a lot of work in order to prevent spending time
on implementing something that may turn out to have fundamental
problems.
The discussions Robert mentioned were before Ada was part
of GCC, and I am not sure I have anything in writing on
these ideas.
-Geert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-04 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-04 20:42 Robert Dewar
2003-03-04 21:01 ` Oliver Kellogg
2003-03-04 22:03 ` Geert Bosch [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-07 20:33 Oliver Kellogg
2012-06-23 18:22 Oliver Kellogg
2012-06-23 22:23 ` Arnaud Charlet
2012-06-17 15:12 Oliver Kellogg
2012-04-15 19:22 oliver.kellogg
2012-04-06 20:24 oliver.kellogg
2012-04-10 10:20 ` Arnaud Charlet
[not found] <1240349826.4554.76.camel@tidbit.site>
[not found] ` <49EE4D58.8020404@adacore.com>
[not found] ` <1240437226.4554.101.camel@tidbit.site>
[not found] ` <49EF9892.1010703@adacore.com>
[not found] ` <1246487007.4507.76.camel@tidbit.site>
2009-08-26 18:39 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-09-27 22:48 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-04-13 16:30 Oliver Kellogg
2009-04-14 14:10 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-04-19 18:48 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-04-20 5:14 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-05-03 21:14 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-05-03 21:17 ` Robert Dewar
2009-05-03 21:22 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-05-04 1:14 ` Robert Dewar
2009-05-04 5:31 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-05-04 12:23 ` Dave Korn
2009-05-09 20:09 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-05-09 20:42 ` Robert Dewar
2009-06-15 20:38 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-06-17 4:20 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-06-28 22:45 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-05-08 21:13 ` Tom Tromey
2009-04-20 18:40 ` Geert Bosch
2009-04-20 20:34 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-04-20 21:12 ` Geert Bosch
2009-04-20 21:35 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-04-27 6:18 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-04-27 8:29 ` Robert Dewar
2009-04-27 18:36 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-04-27 18:47 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-04-27 19:47 ` Tom Tromey
2009-04-27 22:09 ` Oliver Kellogg
2009-04-27 22:26 ` Tom Tromey
2009-04-27 22:44 ` Oliver Kellogg
2003-03-04 22:03 Robert Dewar
2003-03-04 17:08 Oliver Kellogg
2003-03-04 20:07 ` Geert Bosch
2003-03-04 20:49 ` Oliver Kellogg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2144A4FB-4E8D-11D7-B872-00039344BF4A@gnat.com \
--to=bosch@gnat.com \
--cc=Oliver.Kellogg@t-online.de \
--cc=dewar@gnat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).