From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16111 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2004 02:05:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16099 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 02:05:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out3.apple.com) (17.254.13.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 02:05:51 -0000 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0K25onM014569 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:05:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:05:50 -0800 Received: from apple.com (mrs1.apple.com [17.201.24.248]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0K25YPx019452; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:05:34 GMT Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:05:00 -0000 Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: Eric Botcazou , Scott Robert Ladd , Gabriel Dos Reis , Nick Burrett , Marc Espie , geoffk@apple.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org To: Robert Dewar From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <400C402F.9010400@gnat.com> Message-Id: <21A8E98A-4AED-11D8-B42C-003065A77310@apple.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01424.txt.bz2 On Monday, January 19, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Robert Dewar wrote: > My goodness, I would not even *consider* asking a professional > developer > (someone whose time is worth in the region of $1000 a day to a typical > company) to use this low end machine. So we sure have totally different > perspectives. Yes, but the sad thing is that I suspect it is 50% slower or more on a 8 GHz machine as well, in fact, I wonder if it is worse than 50% slower.