From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C2F23858408 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 08:56:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0C2F23858408 Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id a83-20020a1c9856000000b00344731e044bso2542690wme.1 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:56:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jvcouvCBf9VSiUm6TOGs10ZjrimC+NzEavVgEOg3mcw=; b=F8v25njiZ5jH5l//LfS4hqvVCFbsYPuI7nwm/oxiqdb7kfKn9cDSO4PAmaMB20lAUf PU+3vpcjWWIwKlE3cVTZ1f4w/dpsLLh0+W8VqKJKqYoJhpiD8tBEk8GRuJs4AqcGhrXa I0vc/D+/xG+lad8/UXZA+YlK1vXkQ3nH7nMsC7xukpMzDm/0fudBpWZPKzu1sGU5a9GS Lf8D7GW65qCnG4YRWPE9B4cYTZ+vtNmvxm/LvZlPq3KNVAZqjoQimAHvL5xfWUbfCqNF tn6jx5GaYYEc8DmjPZCb/8pr70/e+Cew3/kqQaQlDjoJeTtNvs0I/0ZccHHaDcSDalwh 1HgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WQKZdCAmOoe53G3eS4aNmmyJcRUx71lI466++wxB8i47TE9iV IkSKGqx2cssxHoX1xJ+EjsY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQeOQm04XLBsf79NU3YWjshprB+2UUOYSohkcDlq5l3lDXjroKJQVjLa0EnW2PI3LX/twvbQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4ed2:: with SMTP id g18mr10323119wmq.41.1641545775010; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:56:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.29.0.12] ([188.241.83.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j39sm4072404wms.0.2022.01.07.00.56.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:56:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27083d15-b33a-e4c0-a48f-9f187b5f5a25@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 09:56:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= , Gary Oblock , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" References: <972a5f4d-1e85-074d-900c-10a38d133885@suse.cz> From: Gabriel Ravier In-Reply-To: <972a5f4d-1e85-074d-900c-10a38d133885@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:56:17 -0000 On 1/7/22 09:38, Martin Liška wrote: > On 1/7/22 09:30, Gary Oblock wrote: >> Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic >> and not under my control also we're not supposed to >> use private emails for work... > > I respect that. But please respect me that I won't reply to your > emails any longer. I don't want to follow the conditions in the NOTICE! > > Cheers, > Martin > As far as I know the notice has no legal significance at all (which Gary should probably point out to his management. Really, pretty much the only thing the disclaimer will do is that _some_ people _might_ read it and _some_ of those people _might_ adhere to the terms given there, which is basically meaningless compared to the general annoyance resulting from disclaimers being at the end of e-mails everywhere). You can't just magically establish an agreement that results in a duty of nondisclosure like this without agreement, and just receiving an email obviously isn't that. (although ironically, I guess I should add a disclaimer of my own: I ain't a lawyer and this isn't legal advice)