public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@upchuck.cygnus.com>
To: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu)
Cc: egcs@tantalophile.demon.co.uk (Jamie Lokier), egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: __register_frame_info & shared library compatibility
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 12:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29123.923599928@upchuck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m10VIdz-000ErMC@ocean.lucon.org>

  In message < m10VIdz-000ErMC@ocean.lucon.org >you write:
  > > 
  > > Jeffrey A Law wrote:
  > > > Previously the library would always have those routines, even if it did
  > > > not use EH.
  > > > 
  > > > And any program which referenced that library on the link line would
  > > > get those routines via the library intead of getting its own copies.
  > > > 
  > > > Now you recompile the library.  It no longer gets the EH routines.  Bla
  > m
  > > > your user program stops working.
  > > 
  > > Presumably this is all solved by using Glibc 2.1?
  > > 
  > 
  > Or they can use the latest glibc 2.0 via CVS. I am willing to set up a
  > ftp site with tar files.
What am I not being clear about?

This kind of binary breakage is not acceptable.  It doesn't matter if you
put a new glibc somewhere.  Breaking binaries like that patch did is not
acceptable.

jeff

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@upchuck.cygnus.com>
To: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu)
Cc: egcs@tantalophile.demon.co.uk (Jamie Lokier), egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: __register_frame_info & shared library compatibility
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 23:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29123.923599928@upchuck> (raw)
Message-ID: <19990430231500.a5ALP69tyByp8X77ceevcBAXbreeO5E2T61KMpp9KZ8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m10VIdz-000ErMC@ocean.lucon.org>

  In message < m10VIdz-000ErMC@ocean.lucon.org >you write:
  > > 
  > > Jeffrey A Law wrote:
  > > > Previously the library would always have those routines, even if it did
  > > > not use EH.
  > > > 
  > > > And any program which referenced that library on the link line would
  > > > get those routines via the library intead of getting its own copies.
  > > > 
  > > > Now you recompile the library.  It no longer gets the EH routines.  Bla
  > m
  > > > your user program stops working.
  > > 
  > > Presumably this is all solved by using Glibc 2.1?
  > > 
  > 
  > Or they can use the latest glibc 2.0 via CVS. I am willing to set up a
  > ftp site with tar files.
What am I not being clear about?

This kind of binary breakage is not acceptable.  It doesn't matter if you
put a new glibc somewhere.  Breaking binaries like that patch did is not
acceptable.

jeff

  reply	other threads:[~1999-04-08 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 130+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-04-07  5:14 Mark Kettenis
1999-04-07  5:33 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-07 18:11   ` John Polstra
1999-04-07 23:36     ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-08  9:57       ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-08 10:31         ` H.J. Lu
1999-04-08 12:44           ` Jeffrey A Law [this message]
1999-04-08 12:49             ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-08 12:57               ` H.J. Lu
1999-04-08 13:12                 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-08 13:24                   ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-08 13:31                     ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-08 13:42                       ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-08 13:54                         ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15                           ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15                         ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-30 23:15                       ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-08 14:38                     ` Eric Kidd
1999-04-30 23:15                       ` Eric Kidd
1999-04-30 23:15                     ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-30 23:15                   ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15                 ` H.J. Lu
1999-04-08 13:02               ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15                 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15               ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-08 12:55             ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-08 13:01               ` H.J. Lu
1999-04-08 13:25                 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-08 13:33                   ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-08 13:47                     ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15                       ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15                     ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-30 23:15                   ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15                 ` H.J. Lu
1999-04-08 13:05               ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15                 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15               ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-30 23:15             ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15           ` H.J. Lu
1999-04-08 12:28         ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15           ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-21 11:53         ` David O'Brien
1999-04-21 12:00           ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-21 13:02             ` David O'Brien
1999-04-21 13:20               ` Joe Buck
1999-04-21 13:33                 ` Marc Espie
1999-04-22 22:29                   ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15                     ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15                   ` Marc Espie
1999-04-30 23:15                 ` Joe Buck
1999-04-30 23:15               ` David O'Brien
1999-04-30 23:15             ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-21 12:41           ` "all the world's not Linux" Joe Buck
1999-04-21 12:59             ` David O'Brien
1999-04-21 13:04               ` David Edelsohn
1999-04-30 23:15                 ` David Edelsohn
1999-04-30 23:15               ` David O'Brien
1999-04-30 23:15             ` Joe Buck
1999-04-30 23:15           ` __register_frame_info & shared library compatibility David O'Brien
1999-04-30 23:15         ` Jamie Lokier
1999-04-08 14:56       ` John Polstra
1999-04-08 15:58         ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15           ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-09 13:01         ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-30 23:15           ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-30 23:15         ` John Polstra
1999-04-30 23:15       ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15     ` John Polstra
1999-04-30 23:15   ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Mark Kettenis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-04-21 19:14 N8TM
1999-04-30 23:15 ` N8TM
1999-04-14  5:58 Mark Kettenis
1999-04-14 14:15 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-14 14:57   ` Mark Kettenis
1999-04-30 23:15     ` Mark Kettenis
1999-04-30 23:15   ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Mark Kettenis
1999-04-09  4:49 Mark Kettenis
1999-04-10  1:41 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-10  6:41   ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-11 21:21     ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15       ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15     ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-10  8:28   ` Mark Kettenis
1999-04-11 21:25     ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-12  6:15       ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-13 21:05         ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-13 23:16           ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-13 23:38             ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15               ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15             ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-30 23:15           ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15         ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-30 23:15       ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15     ` Mark Kettenis
1999-04-30 23:15   ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Mark Kettenis
1999-04-06 14:00 Eric Kidd
1999-04-06 14:16 ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-06 14:52   ` Eric Kidd
1999-04-06 15:16     ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-06 15:39       ` Eric Kidd
1999-04-06 15:51         ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-06 16:14           ` Eric Kidd
1999-04-30 23:15             ` Eric Kidd
1999-04-07  1:35           ` Andreas Schwab
1999-04-07  6:32             ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-30 23:15               ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-30 23:15             ` Andreas Schwab
1999-04-30 23:15           ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-30 23:15         ` Eric Kidd
1999-04-30 23:15       ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-30 23:15     ` Eric Kidd
1999-04-06 16:58   ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-06 17:35     ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-06 17:55       ` H.J. Lu
1999-04-30 23:15         ` H.J. Lu
1999-04-07  2:10       ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-07  6:29         ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-07  6:53           ` alex.buell
1999-04-30 23:15             ` alex.buell
1999-04-30 23:15           ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-30 23:15         ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15       ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-30 23:15     ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15   ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-06 17:04 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15   ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Eric Kidd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29123.923599928@upchuck \
    --to=law@upchuck.cygnus.com \
    --cc=egcs@egcs.cygnus.com \
    --cc=egcs@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=hjl@lucon.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).