From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
Received: from loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E02E3858D37
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:40:32 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8E02E3858D37
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loongson.cn
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=loongson.cn
Received: from [10.20.4.52] (unknown [10.20.4.52])
	by localhost.localdomain (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf8CxrmudYjJjZo8iAA--.49061S2;
	Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:40:29 +0800 (CST)
Subject: Re: Number of ALU in la464.md
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Wang Xuerui <i@xen0n.name>
References: <85ef5c4398d48c7e1c87692c5f2d56a755f19c09.camel@xry111.site>
From: Lulu Cheng <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
Message-ID: <29636360-2958-faaf-35ff-ed5d9b757900@loongson.cn>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:40:29 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux mips64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <85ef5c4398d48c7e1c87692c5f2d56a755f19c09.camel@xry111.site>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-CM-TRANSID:AQAAf8CxrmudYjJjZo8iAA--.49061S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73
	VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUY47k0a2IF6w1UM7kC6x804xWl14x267AK
	xVWUJVW8JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGw
	A2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26F1j
	6w1UM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxV
	W8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWxJr0_GcWle2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28I
	cVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JrI_JrylYx
	0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwCYjI0S
	jxkI62AI1cAE67vIY487MxkIecxEwVCm-wCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7x
	kEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E
	67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jrv_JF1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCw
	CI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1x
	MIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_GrUvcSsGvf
	C2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8c6pPUUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: xfkh0wpoxo3qxorr0wxvrqhubq/
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,MEDICAL_SUBJECT,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>

You are right, I just added it before, but I didn't see the performance 
improvement,

so I didn't change this place.

在 2022/9/25 下午7:28, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> Hi,
>
> According to the schematic
> (https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/Loongson-3A5000-usermanual-EN.html#la464-processor-core,
> Figure 5) we have 4 ALUs in LA464, but in la464.md we only define
> la464_alu1 and la464_alu2.
>
> Should we add la464_alu{3,4} as well, or am I missing something here?