From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson@cygnus.com>, frichard@bbn.com, egcs@cygnus.com, jvs@bbn.com, asolomon@bbn.com, kpowers@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Cygnus Supported GCC vs. EGCS GCC 
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 21:03:00 -0000
Message-id: <29695.876888328@hurl.cygnus.com>
References: <u9zpob6al2.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
X-SW-Source: 1997-10/msg00557.html

  In message < u9zpob6al2.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com >you write:
  > >>>>> "Jim" == Jim Wilson <wilson@cygnus.com> writes:
  > 
  > 
  >     Jim> The new haifa-scheduler should help here.  Did you try using --ena
  > ble-haifa?
  > 
  > Really?  Isn't haifa enabled by default?
Only on the PA right now.

First, haifa problably won't help too much without retuning the scheduling
parameters.  I did this for the PA, and I think someone submitted them
for the sparc, but did so after we went into a "slush" (as opposed to 
a "freeze" :-)

Second, we really haven't beat on haifa as much on other targets yet --
though that's improved over the last several weeks with folks reporting
with & without haifa test results.

jeff