From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46988 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2019 17:30:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 46845 invoked by uid 89); 8 Aug 2019 17:30:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=cc0, CC0, quality X-HELO: resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.167) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 17:30:52 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.234]) by resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id vjNNhEIfvECY9vmFWhPKYB; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 17:30:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1565285450; bh=a++oRrfAg9k+xNjYFA2LOzme3mTQBWfNI/975iTqfW0=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=jquCrp0VAIXLIJuYRcRI0UsQV6lDBiqM/tF+S7uM3IcC9aByNINzi5DlnJlqJ85WY mBGUeV4Nx8Z4WOO2/TYmj9f2MR9xNhonwXgrjiGPQZgEfdjaAstEgYzxv+m991WPXy MSvLsz7xrrSBDm3Qaxht+3z+UVOpj3y7yecQ6KcrhU33/ZP3ZgmKEXJer7X06rXiaw gRNvkFz8Ysjqs7ryw8Au32scVhv99sjAy+AgaBAQE+nPhGeH+ouAs+13x4vE9LhFbT wzNo5AV90WXsL3PbW3ksaznAAkj+r3zOhZ9NvhEDC/8xCWnQNyoj4idQuyWRm8oNRk iR1Z1V5r1NMuA== Received: from pkoning.akdesign.com ([73.60.223.101]) by resomta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id vmFNhbQ1uoSAzvmFPhxqxE; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 17:30:45 +0000 X-Xfinity-VAAS: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudduhedgudduhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucevohhmtggrshhtqdftvghsihdpqfgfvfdppffquffrtefokffrnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrrghulhcumfhonhhinhhguceophgruhhlkhhonhhinhhgsegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepjeefrdeitddrvddvfedruddtudenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghlohepphhkohhnihhnghdrrghkuggvshhighhnrdgtohhmpdhinhgvthepjeefrdeitddrvddvfedruddtuddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehprghulhhkohhnihhnghestghomhgtrghsthdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehsvghghhgvrheskhgvrhhnvghlrdgtrhgrshhhihhnghdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehvmhgrkhgrrhhovhesrhgvughhrghtrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhohhhnsegurghrrhhinhhgthhonhdrfigrthhtlhgvrdhiugdrrghupdhrtghpthhtohepghgttgesghgttgdrghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-100;st=legit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra From: Paul Koning In-Reply-To: <20190808172102.GH31406@gate.crashing.org> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 17:30:00 -0000 Cc: Vladimir Makarov , John Darrington , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2EEBCFAE-FF25-4664-AA5F-B3299CEA3CB1@comcast.net> References: <20190804191822.x4hwnfcyplnto3xc@jocasta.intra> <2B3A4EAB-D69E-4714-8FC4-C25E36B07BFF@comcast.net> <20190808172102.GH31406@gate.crashing.org> To: Segher Boessenkool X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 > On Aug 8, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >=20 > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 12:43:52PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote: >>> On Aug 8, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Vladimir Makarov wro= te: >>> The old reload (reload[1].c) supports such addressing. As modern mains= tream architectures have no this kind of addressing, it was not implemented= in LRA. >>=20 >> Is LRA only intended for "modern mainstream architectures"? >=20 > I sure hope not! But it has only been *used* and *tested* much on such, > so far.=20 That's not entirely accurate. At the prodding of people pushing for the re= moval of CC0 and reload, I've added LRA support to pdp11 in the V9 cycle. = And it works pretty well, in the sense of passing the compile tests. But I= haven't yet examined the code quality vs. the old one in any detail. paul