From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-189365-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 126504 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:00:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126462 invoked by uid 89); 24 Nov 2015 18:00:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: ausc60pc101.us.dell.com
Received: from ausc60pc101.us.dell.com (HELO ausc60pc101.us.dell.com) (143.166.85.206) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:00:05 +0000
X-LoopCount0: from 10.170.28.41
From: <Paul_Koning@Dell.com>
To: <iant@google.com>
CC: <dw@limegreensocks.com>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: basic asm and memory clobbers
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <2F3EDFFC-D849-4527-8EED-8370206728B1@dell.com>
References: <564AC155.4040601@LimeGreenSocks.com> <564B9CB1.1060001@redhat.com> <564E762B.6070705@LimeGreenSocks.com> <564EF338.4030703@redhat.com> <564EF7FF.1070107@LimeGreenSocks.com> <564F008B.8040703@redhat.com> <564F1436.2060005@LimeGreenSocks.com> <564F1A7D.9050607@redhat.com> <20151120152039.GA15922@gate.crashing.org> <564F3C6E.5010908@redhat.com> <20151120153431.GJ5675@tucnak.redhat.com> <564F46CF.2030403@redhat.com> <564FB2ED.70803@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56506A03.7030609@LimeGreenSocks.com> <5652E4A6.9090905@redhat.com> <56537921.9070809@redhat.com> <565386CA.8080005@LimeGreenSocks.com> <C080D84D-C192-46F6-BAE9-9E3B5A9F766C@dell.com> <5653BFC5.5080305@LimeGreenSocks.com> <54275115-454B-4CCB-BEA8-752A14B24E62@dell.com> <CAKOQZ8xx3zPmDpkmizMqq9VN6u4x5b2ZPsMT5tNvV3n-4dRe7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKOQZ8xx3zPmDpkmizMqq9VN6u4x5b2ZPsMT5tNvV3n-4dRe7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D02FB310EB70D54081AF0D9DD43A2294@dell.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2


> On Nov 24, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
>=20
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:58 AM,  <Paul_Koning@dell.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> I'm really concerned with loosening the meaning of basic asm.  I
>> wish I could find the documentation that says, or implies, that it
>> is a memory clobber.  And/or that it is implicitly volatile.
>=20
> The volatile one is right there in the current docs.
>=20
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Basic-Asm.html#Basic-Asm
>=20
> "All basic asm blocks are implicitly volatile."

Ok, that's what I remembered.  I reported finding that this was not impleme=
nted correctly, some number of versions ago.

	paul