From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19275 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2018 17:13:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19249 invoked by uid 89); 25 Apr 2018 17:13:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=caught, Hx-languages-length:462 X-HELO: mail-yb0-f177.google.com Received: from mail-yb0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-yb0-f177.google.com) (209.85.213.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:13:25 +0000 Received: by mail-yb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id y5-v6so8508476ybg.0 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:13:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vdBjR44o20yDoNMYG/3XdAmOfjQPDcir3gG/c37AThQ=; b=WNhtcH/NDWfbA1Ge7eWOCeJqfr//XXP5j1YSGR7xvTMGsOtA2EEoK2DqHEVzzzLbyk XH1PjtcIP7fLHfmF1ApbAohsElc72aE0XJf8Xk9qzWTmZpwkxDp5rBMeMzw3adAZRYN0 zqhoq8wJLzGMXzJAGWRn5xUWESNiAMzsIS3mrGUCkZTJkAtD0kZYWrenQ01j4NLcbkdq Gm7cXBtRnhXKR+mx1FPKb/RPtMvcQ7yT8XTccjxgu+WQQQNenDKp9NUcUeJcK5AIUIdm ffo6WFNKRB589tXnIJ5ApnjufLWdMN6rpuv6sQjL7oWmMLwxvSRCFZk/XbD06yWMEVSZ du0w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDCHzK1dg1Au1kDrzEdhBMKgbFYqGQB37LXLrIAI20VqhtNESkC YvqdSxL7mfEB/YJ2DLtR3fE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49ENlRd2hidzX2R3lBBrU/qBRKUIJhsfsDNcgz4SiBs5Iqrknn8vxvDD1q1OFcJjLfBEGrqow== X-Received: by 2002:a25:8312:: with SMTP id s18-v6mr16674838ybk.444.1524676403485; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:10d:c0a3:20fb:7500:e7fb:4a6f:2254? ([2620:10d:c091:200::1:177e]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p17-v6sm4486714ywe.100.2018.04.25.10.13.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++ To: Jonathan Wakely , David Malcolm Cc: Andrew Haley , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20180425122305.GS20930@redhat.com> <7039f928-e50b-1f75-4f71-70fda5873ab0@redhat.com> <53171c2e-1d8d-91f7-c6f7-16273e8840a6@redhat.com> <20180425140452.GT20930@redhat.com> <736ee54e-fc2a-17f0-574a-6d889fdc2336@redhat.com> <20180425155420.GA12873@redhat.com> <1524673358.2961.4.camel@redhat.com> <20180425164530.GW20930@redhat.com> From: Nathan Sidwell Message-ID: <2bdcbea9-307c-64cb-51b9-51b02eadae27@acm.org> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:50:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180425164530.GW20930@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 On 04/25/2018 12:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > @@ -15869,6 +15851,12 @@ finish_function (bool inline_p) >     { >       warning (OPT_Wreturn_type, >               "no return statement in function returning non-void"); > +      if (DECL_NAME (fndecl) == assign_op_identifier) IDENTIFIER_ASSIGN_OP_P (DECL_NAME (fndecl)), so += and friends are also caught? nathan -- Nathan Sidwell