From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-89516-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32743 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2004 11:31:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32728 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 11:31:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp2.libero.it) (193.70.192.52)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 11:31:34 -0000
Received: from bagio (151.41.184.52) by smtp2.libero.it (7.0.020-DD01)
        id 3F6F0DA902210E99; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:32:13 +0100
Message-ID: <2e6801c3df48$f30b4fb0$34b82997@bagio>
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: "Karel Gardas" <kgardas@objectsecurity.com>,
	"GCC Mailing List" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0401201004240.8443-100000@thinkpad.wg-ro-gar1.inext.cz>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICO project sources.
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:31:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01471.txt.bz2

Karel Gardas wrote:

> I would also like to post bugreport to bugzilla, but I don't know how
> to attach preprocessed file there. Is it possible to add them after
> clicking on ``Commit'' button?

Yes. Please, create a new bug report for *each* different regression. It's
easier for us to track and comment on them, since they're different bugs
anyway.

> Should I copy whole email table there, or is
> link to gcc mailing list enough? (I'm afraid about table re-formating in
html,
> I don't have experience with it under Mozilla)

For each bug, you can report the bugs that matter (and link to the mailing list
as a base reference for the discussion).

Thanks!
Giovanni Bajo