From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E110B386EC33 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:08:11 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E110B386EC33 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-252-N-klcVvRMcC7qTNo231Row-1; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 14:08:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: N-klcVvRMcC7qTNo231Row-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E2F4800D55; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-161.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.161]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381F11000320; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: CC0 removal branch To: Segher Boessenkool , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20201215172729.GE2672@gate.crashing.org> From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <2ff0c630-d626-81a4-9f34-bdc975838813@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:08:04 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201215172729.GE2672@gate.crashing.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:08:12 -0000 On 12/15/20 10:27 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > I have updated my CC0 removal branch I started in 2019: > refs/users/segher/heads/cc0 > (yes I know this needs some patch series work; this branch rebases). > > I have tested it all on powerpc*, and sill test it with cross-compilers > to all Linux targets later today. I already know one problem that will > run into: the h8300 port still uses cc0! In peepholes, and also in > h8300.c (cc0_rtx). All that is dead code I bet, but that still doesn't > compile if CC0 is removed ;-) It's dead code.  The peepholes a shouldn't be included by the main .md file.  I've got a partial conversion of those here.  Still lots of cleanup and improvements queued up.  Don't let anything H8 related get in the way :-)  If it breaks, I'll take care of it. jeff