public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Albert Cohen <Albert.Cohen@inria.fr>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: complete_unrolli / complete_unroll
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:54:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <303e1d290909291123t480939f6oe83d76c7536419e1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84fc9c000908200148p57979f3cp5e440f778b8fc484@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can't we use graphite to re-roll loops?  That is, compress the
> polyhedron by introducing a new parameter?  But maybe I am
> not good at guessing what your initial bloat issue looks like.
>
> The reason I'm asking is that there is enough code out in the
> wild that has loops with manually unrolled bodies - I have seen
> up to 16 times here.

Do we want to try to address this partially in GCC 4.5?  Providing
some way to disable early unrolling either explicitly or implicitly
when Graphite is enabled?

Early unrolling can cause two problems:

1) Increase the size of SCoPs, which increases memory consumption and
analysis time.

2) Confusing SCoP analysis.

Separate from re-rolling and other long-term solutions, it would be
helpful for Graphite if there was some explicit control over early
unrolling to help with experimentation.

Thanks, David

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-29 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-19 11:53 mips64 gcc 3.3.6 problem Sergey Anosov
2009-08-19 11:55 ` Paolo Carlini
2009-08-19 12:13 ` complete_unrolli / complete_unroll Albert Cohen
2009-08-19 12:33   ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-19 12:35     ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-19 13:56     ` Albert Cohen
2009-08-19 14:44       ` Albert Cohen
2009-08-19 15:09         ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-19 20:30           ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-20  8:45             ` Albert Cohen
2009-08-20  9:57               ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-20 13:34                 ` Albert Cohen
2009-09-29 18:54                 ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2009-09-30 12:36                   ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-20 11:20 Dominique Dhumieres
2009-08-20 12:25 ` Richard Guenther

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=303e1d290909291123t480939f6oe83d76c7536419e1@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=Albert.Cohen@inria.fr \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).