From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Mike Stump <mrs@windriver.com>
Cc: dje@watson.ibm.com, msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG, binutils@sources.redhat.com, crossgcc@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: An article about the Cygnus tree 
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 17:54:00 -0000
Message-id: <3145.968288162@upchuck>
References: <200009070049.RAA21087@kankakee.wrs.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-09/msg00136.html

  In message < 200009070049.RAA21087@kankakee.wrs.com >you write:
  > > To: msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Sokolov)
  > > Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 16:05:27 -0400
  > > From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
  > 
  > > No one is arguing against merging the trees.  It simply takes time
  > > and effort which no one has time to tackle at the moment.
  > 
  > Out of curiosity, would a sym link in the repo from src/gcc over to
  > egcs/gcc not fix the bulk of the problem?
Because CVS doesn't DTRT with symlinks.  At least that what I was
told.

jeff