From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rodgert@appliantology.com>
Received: from mx.kolabnow.com (mx.kolabnow.com [95.128.36.41])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF54388A43F
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:04:29 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0CF54388A43F
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=appliantology.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rodgert@appliantology.com
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACBCA09;
 Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:04:27 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h=
 message-id:references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:date
 :date:content-type:content-type:mime-version:received:received
 :received; s=dkim20160331; t=1618067066; x=1619881467; bh=enk0+C
 4FCceskurOYE5TMWYl0MHZIx3QORkZBQbc0WU=; b=WGEVIKGcLGpU/BYPKV6IFu
 q/81YDxxXCQPRm4oW+AXeWHOSpqFU0KpGGH0c6pbU3e4n7tJYcQTRTOZh8ILp/st
 ORZBoMOKTXKgwCwJ99NkShoMVmsjJb3kggXYalqzRGfllC6G/0H/I4Qcd8yoi+JQ
 GR+Mylx/bc989m1N92b1/gObR+Bz0oSbyY1OC9eI+tgQm+WvjYqaVPDITxxb1csw
 eT49NEdMURpTbZYnVIT4a6s/5y9LFWt/0kIbupfx18HaZPIguV1dA6TdgD5MVBRz
 swMEQwNSUR5XmqL6esKzz4hK7agxdmlfGgNIO6COfqHku7vK+B5+hM0IJQHxCksD
 Cw0r8LIrTsC5OlXPa+zd4P9giMuVnG1pMF2EA05Bxc5ac7C6xV+xYTATgz31gJ1k
 RgFiJK11FxKU0099rLeIql2EfDjR4aOxi3I+7VM4QRUIXMy0rKQ202EXGTe2IyuV
 8Bd7eq26x10AkliBkl8uKlW64cO0yg7Voo9cMIJ71H5DD32OodkB27W1vSVrUQGa
 PX/1HrzMn7D5qcgJ5SLBNKDZCEoWxrd3vb8tooSoXeOcG5FIdPVbSW4dF/6RZn/z
 588y3qgw08A8Dp1nSJXRbuslqh//umXk7xmfeSiVxNqAhHxeTUx+yQpqk1snUgw0
 XRCltyBuh8a26jRvojSTY=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_SHORT, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id AqxNEPSh9VMJ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:04:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from int-mx002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.2])
 by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9271E672;
 Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:04:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from int-subm001.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.37.1])
 by int-mx002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 983033CF5;
 Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:04:24 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 08:04:22 -0700
From: Thomas Rodgers <rodgert@appliantology.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Pankaj Jangid <pankaj@codeisgreat.org>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdTDrtBiForWra-Nr7tM+fOmVbaAGLoRpwCC85rPHcD5Ew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20210407162454.GA22759@jocasta.intra>
 <ca90922445fe9e0dff577da6989cf9490fd331fc.camel@redhat.com>
 <20210408064528.GA10349@jocasta.intra>
 <94ca414af699bab851008f86f006db4bd8bf1929.camel@redhat.com>
 <20210408182128.GA19715@jocasta.intra>
 <5f532c131146b9c7549f03eac7a9da3a29db1a2e.camel@redhat.com>
 <20210409063749.GA8596@jocasta.intra>
 <04fa3173-9809-b905-8fa3-f6554b8ae7d7@hesbynett.no>
 <trinity-e6c8d0eb-d3e4-465a-82b1-70d106629ba0-1617979220916@3c-app-mailcom-bs08>
 <06eb8287-e6bb-270f-e5a5-730c10bb31ef@hesbynett.no>
 <20210409183631.GA29274@jocasta.intra>
 <69BA3B4D-C798-4700-B607-994588BD5D87@tesio.it>
 <CAKOQZ8yktzW3s0M+e0HqE1u81zGYKupRhFfKe-b5BEFap2dsEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <B69DC1D0-130C-42D7-B923-AB2AA65EB674@tesio.it>
 <CAH6eHdTCZuKBvqQOp3apPEXVB0BZ91wwV9b0afsnvzi-WqJt_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <m2v98unzh7.fsf@codeisgreat.org>
 <CAH6eHdTDrtBiForWra-Nr7tM+fOmVbaAGLoRpwCC85rPHcD5Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3152a2058548d29589d2cead0c22038e@appliantology.com>
X-Sender: rodgert@appliantology.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:04:30 -0000

On 2021-04-10 05:35, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, 12:57 Pankaj Jangid, <pankaj@codeisgreat.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> 
> You are clueless about what the SC actually does, or the control they
> have over GCC.
> I think, it would be great help if someone can document what the SC
> does.

https://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html

They make decisions, they don't get to insert NSA backdoors on behalf of
their employers without the rest of the project being aware. The idea 
that
the SC members have a special ability to sneak such a change in, any 
more
than any contributor, is just stupid. But I don't think he's seriously
worried about that, he's just a Concern Troll raising nonsense concerns 
to
derail any useful discussion from happening. The sooner he moves on to a
new compiler he trusts, the better for everybody involved in GCC.

Him too really, it's important to have trust in your toolchain...