From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25178 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2009 10:57:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 25170 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Aug 2009 10:57:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailout1.go2.pl (HELO mailout1.go2.pl) (193.17.41.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:57:23 +0000 Received: from mailout1.go2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.104]) by mailout1.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CD030021; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from o2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.37]) by mailout1.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_"-fno-unswitch-loops"_option_have_no_effect=3F?= From: =?UTF-8?Q?ami=5Fstuff?= To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Guy?= Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <56d259a00908170344v54442954u3a5d0337de3b98fe@mail.gmail.com> References: <5dd91bc1.7ff0289a.4a88a6a0.1e15f@o2.pl> <56d259a00908170344v54442954u3a5d0337de3b98fe@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3165a1e6.6c5afa14.4a89378f.5d332@o2.pl> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:29:00 -0000 X-Originator: 212.67.149.145 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 Hi, > Hundreds and hundreds of people read this list, so every low-detail > "I think there may be a bug" message you send wastes hours of other > people's time. Ok, Ok, but if someone will reproduce the same problem on his system I can = fill bugreport, otherwise I will only waste my time, hours of my time, to start detailed bu= greport. Maybe this is only fault of my GCC's build? > If it *is* a bug, on the bug tracker, it will be picked up by people > interested in that specific area It may takes months before someone will look at the bugreport. If it's real= ly a bug IMHO it's a bit critical bug. > though you don't seem to do much > in-depth research, nor do you supply any detail of what you did and > what you expected. There is no need for much detail, just compile any bigger sourcecode with -= O3 -fno-.. and after that with -O2 .... When the object files are not identical, something= is wrong and I can start a bug report. Regards